Government slammed for ‘tax grabbing’ low-income super proposal

By Grace Ormsby

November 15 2019
Share

A proposal floated by government that would see workers earning less than $50,000 a year able to opt out of compulsory super has been slammed as nothing more than a tax grab.

The idea is being considered as part of the federal government’s Retirement Income Review, which is looking at the “three pillars” of Australia’s existing retirement system: the means-based Age Pension, compulsory superannuation and voluntary savings.

Floated by Liberal senator Andrew Bragg, the proposal would see workers earning less than $50,000 able to opt out of compulsory super and instead receive the amount of money that would have gone into their super account in wages instead.

Industry Super Australia (ISA) has weighed in on the idea, noting that while the idea is being touted by some as a pay boost for low-income workers, “the numbers make it clear the real winner is the government, with workers left paying higher taxes to line government coffers”.

Wages are taxed at a higher rate than super contributions, with ISA indicating that this is almost double in most cases.

According to the industry body, it means that workers who take super as wages will raid their retirement savings only to pay more tax.

To highlight its point, it has released analysis that shows “the extent of the super tax grab” in Tasmania.

ISA said 102,500 Tasmanian workers would be affected by the proposal, which would see them losing a total of $350 million a year in retirement savings, while also being slugged an extra $101 million in personal tax.

This equates to around $1,000 more in tax payable for the average worker each year.

Commenting on the issue, ISA chief executive Bernie Dean slammed the “dangerous proposal”.

“Tasmanian workers will be slugged more than 100 million more in tax every year, only to end up destitute in retirement.”

Arguing that “the numbers don’t lie”, Mr Dean called it “a blatant tax grab by the government to prop up its own budget bottom line, at the expense of hardworking Tasmanians’ retirement savings”.

About the author

Grace Ormsby

Grace is a journalist on Momentum Media's nestegg. She enjoys being able to provide easy to digest information and practical tips for Australians with regard to their wealth, as well as having a platform on which to engage leading experts and commentators and leverage their insight.

About the author

Grace Ormsby

Grace is a journalist on Momentum Media's nestegg. She enjoys being able to provide easy to digest information and practical tips for Australians with regard to their wealth, as well as having a platform on which to engage leading experts and commentators and leverage their insight.

sections

most read

sections

most read

sections

most read

sections

most read

sections

most read

sections

most read

sections

most read

Most read

Age Pension increase prompts Australians to review their finances

Latest Podcast

Twice the demand: the case study behind Melbourne’s first‑home buyer surge

Resources

There is $17.5 billion in lost and unclaimed super across ...

Retirement