Powered by momentummedia
nestegg logo
Powered by momentummedia
nestegg logo
nestegg logo

Retirement

‘Take the control back’ from super funds: adviser

By Lucy Dean · June 04 2018
Reading:
egg
egg
egg

Retirement

‘Take the control back’ from super funds: adviser

By Lucy Dean
June 04 2018
Reading:
egg
egg
egg

‘Take the control back’ from super funds: adviser

author image
By Lucy Dean · June 04 2018
Reading:
egg
egg
egg

A lot of people have “no idea” when it comes to super but it’s up to Aussie consumers to “take a bit of that control back”,  and force the industry to improve, an adviser has said.

“One of my biggest frustrations about consumers and superannuation is they have no idea,” Hewison Private Wealth director and adviser Nathan Lear told Nest Egg.  

“They start a job and they’re like, ‘I'll put my money in whatever fund’, they don't research it, they don't know what they're paying, they don't even know if they've got any insurance in there.

“I like to put it back on the consumers a little bit and say, ‘Take a bit of that control back, understand what you're paying and seek advice.’”

His words follow the Productivity Commission’s damning report on the industry last week, which described the system as an “unlucky lottery” for Australian workers and retirees.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The report said the $2.6 trillion super system suffered from out-dated architecture, structural flaws and “entrenched underperformance”. All flaws contributed to a $2.6 billion sting from excess fees and “zombie” insurance policies.

“These problems are highly regressive in their impact — and they harm young and lower income Australians the most,” said the deputy chair of the Productivity Commission, Karen Chester.

Recognising this, the Productivity Commission proposed new entrants to the workforce select a super fund from a top 10 list curated by an independent government agency.

Mr Lear agreed that a weak super fund can lead to “thousands and thousands and thousands” of dollars lost from the retirement balance, but disagreed with the Productivity Commission’s proposal.

“A government agency only giving a list of 10 funds; who's to say that their investigations are going to be better than a quality advice firm?” Mr Lear asked.

He said the proposal could also stifle innovation by limiting individuals’ control and flexibility.

“Obviously the government wants to protect Australians' interests and make sure they're not getting ripped off, and I completely appreciate that and maybe there are other ways they can do that,” Mr Lear said.

For individuals, he said it comes down to understanding how much you’re paying, and what you’re paying for.

“Fees can be quite tricky for the non-sophisticated investor to fully comprehend and appreciate because there are different layers. I encourage any Millennial or super investor to have a real good look at the website of the super provider, the fee section of the PDS, and just really work through the different layers,” Mr Lear said.

Typically there’s an investment fee, an administration or accounting fee, an insurance fee and potentially an investment management expense ratio.”

He said this is where he would start, given the power of compound interest.

“Keeping those fees as low as possible, that's going to get you in a good place to start,” Mr Lear concluded.

‘Take the control back’ from super funds: adviser
nestegg logo

Forward this article to a friend. Follow us on Linkedin. Join us on Facebook. Find us on Twitter for the latest updates
Rate the article

Join the nestegg community

We Translate Complicated Financial Jargon Into Easy-To-Understand Information For Australians

Your email address will be shared with nestegg and subject to our Privacy Policy

From the web

Recommended by Spike Native Network

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.