Invest
Can your employer sack you for refusing the jab?
While employers cannot force an employee to get the jab, they can implement a compulsory vaccination program.
Can your employer sack you for refusing the jab?
While employers cannot force an employee to get the jab, they can implement a compulsory vaccination program.

As it currently stands, employers cannot pressure their employees to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, but they can opt to implement a compulsory vaccination program, which could exert unduly pressure on individuals who chose to forego the jab.
“The decision to introduce a COVID-19 vaccination program at the workplace should be based upon a valid risk assessment that is undertaken in consultation with employees,” Larry Drewsen, health and safety manager at Employsure, explained.
“Where the outcome of the risk assessment indicates the vaccination is the only reasonable control measure, employers have a duty of care to ensure the health and safety of all employees and others who visit the workplace.”
It is under these circumstances that employers are being advised to introduce a compulsory program. And, although they cannot legally enforce it, employers have the right to “consult” with employees who are unable, or don’t want the COVID-19 vaccination, and discuss alternative measures.

While workers do not have to tell their employer if they have been vaccinated, or even give a reason behind it, employers can still ask the question.
Moreover, employers are being advised by workplace relations adviser Employsure to monitor which employees have been vaccinated by using employee management software.
“Employers have an obligation to take reasonably practicable steps to ensure a safe workplace, and vaccinations are a critical component if we are to successfully come out of this pandemic. While vaccinations form part of a business’s methods of controlling the risk of infection, a business must therefore have other plans in place if they have workers who refuse to be vaccinated.
“It is up to employers to encourage their workers to get vaccinated, provide them with relevant government health information, and allow workers who want the jab during work hours the right to do so without loss of pay,” Mr Drewsen said.
The Fair Work Ombudsman provides similar advice, noting that in order to refuse the jab, employees have to have a “legitimate reason”, for example, a medical reason.
Employers are, however, being cautioned to consider their obligations and responsibilities under anti-discrimination laws, which generally prohibit discrimination against employees in the workplace based on protected characteristics, such as disability, pregnancy or religious beliefs.
The FWO further explained that if an employee refuses a direction to be vaccinated, it’s unlikely that their employer can stand them down.
In fact, as the law prescribes, the employer can only take disciplinary action, including termination, against an employee for refusing to be vaccinated if the employee’s refusal is in breach of a specific law, or a clear and repeated lawful and reasonable direction requiring vaccination.
For more information, click here.
About the author

About the author


Advice
Choosing between bonds and equities: What’s best for you?
Investing can be a daunting task, especially when faced with the myriad of options available. Two of the most common asset classes are bonds and equities, both with their own unique characteristics ...Read more

Advice
Macquarie responds to ASIC's Federal Court proceedings
The bank has responded to civil penalty proceedings commenced by ASIC. Read more

Advice
Macquarie Bank taken to court by ASIC
The corporate regulator has taken action against the bank. Read more

Advice
ASIC's finfluencer warning a 'wake-up call'
The corporate regulator has published an information sheet on how the law applies to social media influencers or “finfluencers” and licensees who use them. Read more

Advice
Compensation scheme fails to protect Aussie investors
The FPA is concerned the government’s proposed CSLR model won’t provide adequate protection for Australian investors. Read more

Advice
ASIC says it’s ‘emotionally inappropriate’ to apologise to victims of Sterling collapse
The corporate regulator has conceded that it could have acted differently in response to concerns with the Sterling Group but has refused to apologise for the matter. Read more

Advice
Corporate regulator defends decision to not act earlier on Sterling collapse
The corporate regulator said it did not believe there was any “particular concern” to act on complaints regarding the Sterling Income Trust when it was first brought to its attention. Read more

Advice
‘Policing TikTok advice would inhibit innovation’
Jane Hume is adamant that curtailing finfluencers via legislation would be equivalent to creating a nanny state with “unworkable” rail guards that inhibit progress and innovation. Read more

Advice
Choosing between bonds and equities: What’s best for you?
Investing can be a daunting task, especially when faced with the myriad of options available. Two of the most common asset classes are bonds and equities, both with their own unique characteristics ...Read more

Advice
Macquarie responds to ASIC's Federal Court proceedings
The bank has responded to civil penalty proceedings commenced by ASIC. Read more

Advice
Macquarie Bank taken to court by ASIC
The corporate regulator has taken action against the bank. Read more

Advice
ASIC's finfluencer warning a 'wake-up call'
The corporate regulator has published an information sheet on how the law applies to social media influencers or “finfluencers” and licensees who use them. Read more

Advice
Compensation scheme fails to protect Aussie investors
The FPA is concerned the government’s proposed CSLR model won’t provide adequate protection for Australian investors. Read more

Advice
ASIC says it’s ‘emotionally inappropriate’ to apologise to victims of Sterling collapse
The corporate regulator has conceded that it could have acted differently in response to concerns with the Sterling Group but has refused to apologise for the matter. Read more

Advice
Corporate regulator defends decision to not act earlier on Sterling collapse
The corporate regulator said it did not believe there was any “particular concern” to act on complaints regarding the Sterling Income Trust when it was first brought to its attention. Read more

Advice
‘Policing TikTok advice would inhibit innovation’
Jane Hume is adamant that curtailing finfluencers via legislation would be equivalent to creating a nanny state with “unworkable” rail guards that inhibit progress and innovation. Read more