Super fees to be more clearly disclosed

Super fees to be more clearly disclosed

ASIC, Superannuation, super fees, retirement savings, retirement planning, wealth management,

Superannuation funds will face tougher regulations around the way they inform their members of their fees from 30 September.

After finding a “significant amount of under-reporting” of fees in the superannuation industry, ASIC has decided to introduce new requirements for funds to better disclose their fees to members.

“The changes will help bring industry-wide consistency to exactly what must be included in the product disclosure statement,” ASIC said.

“And, from later in 2018, the changes will also ensure that the information in PDS and in periodic statements will match more clearly; as a result, consumers will be better able to understand the fees and costs.

“The consistency and more accurate disclosure of fees will also help ensure that funds are competing more fairly.”

The regulator noted that some fees are charged based on the kind of investments being made on the members’ behalf, and that some of the higher returning investments may come with higher charges, but that the new reporting requirements would take this into consideration and make sure members know why those fees are being charged.

Additionally, ASIC said it will undertake compliance checks to make sure funds are meeting their new obligations to their members.

Super fees to be more clearly disclosed
nestegg logo
Promoted Content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
Dr Terry Dwyer, Dwye... - Crocodile tears from the people who have driven land prices ever upwards with near zero interest rates? Where did these people learn economics?.......
Kevin - A very small investment in May/ June in Ethereum has literally made 2 million. And rising. Would have made more had I bought in March, but I needed.......
KateGan - This is our age of digital crimes... The only way to prevent such things is to raise the awareness about cybersecurity measures that every business.......
DavidL - Given that PPL is government funded, why doesn't the government foot the bill for the extra 9.5% - over the whole PPL period, not just 6 months? Why.......