Powered by momentummedia
nestegg logo
Powered by momentummedia
nestegg logo
nestegg logo

Invest

Is there a blunder in Labor's negative gearing model?

By Reporter · April 11 2019
Reading:
egg
egg
egg

Invest

Is there a blunder in Labor's negative gearing model?

By Reporter
April 11 2019
Reading:
egg
egg
egg
Houses and Chris Bowen

Is there a blunder in Labor's negative gearing model?

author image
By Reporter · April 11 2019
Reading:
egg
egg
egg
Houses and Chris Bowen

Property experts are questioning the modelling of Labor's negative gearing policy, as new data suggests the breakdown of purchases for new and existing properties are far removed from the figures the policy is centred on. 

The policy

If elected, the Labor Party will limit negative gearing to new housing from 1 January 2020.

Further, the Labor Party plans to halve the capital gains discount for all assets purchased after the same date. In effect, this will reduce the capital gains tax discount for assets that are held longer than 12 months from 50 per cent to 25 per cent.

On both measures, all changes will be grandfathered, which means they won’t apply retrospectively.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Learn more about labor negative gearing policy issued by investors applied to all forms of investments. 

The questions

Labor’s policy fails to include off-the-plan and house-and-land packages in its estimation that more than 90 per cent of new investment loans are to people purchasing existing housing stock, according to the Property Investors Council of Australia's chair, Ben Kingsley.

"Australia’s biggest aggregator, AFG – with over 2,900 mortgage brokers – confirmed its mortgage application data for new investment purchases vs existing property was 43 per cent new and 57 per cent existing,” he said.

“This seriously puts into question Labor’s logic in crafting the policy and absolutely challenges their revenue assumptions.”

The implications

Mr Kingsley added that Labor’s taxation policies could potentially alter the property market significantly, so their policies must be reliant on accurate data.

“We need to address this immediately, as it is very much in the interest of the 10 million plus property owners that are going to see the values of their property fall to pieces across Australia.”

Is there a blunder in Labor's negative gearing model?
Houses and Chris Bowen
nestegg logo

Forward this article to a friend. Follow us on Linkedin. Join us on Facebook. Find us on Twitter for the latest updates
Rate the article

Join the nestegg community

We Translate Complicated Financial Jargon Into Easy-To-Understand Information For Australians

Your email address will be shared with nestegg and subject to our Privacy Policy

From the web

Recommended by Spike Native Network

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.