subscribe to our newsletter sign up

The super industry’s sticking point

meeting, discussion

Super funds are getting better at communicating but poor records in protecting low balance members are an ongoing source of friction, a new report has found.

Research firm Investment Trends’ latest member engagement report found that funds are starting to capitalise on the power of social media, mobile apps and online chat to boost engagement, but are still falling down when it comes to member insurance.

“Super funds have enthusiastically promoted insurance to their members, but the lack of urgency among many funds to commit to the Voluntary Code of Practice is beginning to affect their social licence,” said Investment Trends technology analyst Ian Webster.

“Most funds are only gradually accepting their role in protecting low balance members and supporting the member claims process, but AustralianSuper is among the few that have taken early and decisive action.”

He continued, “Among the 44 largest super funds surveyed, roughly half have yet to provide explicit guidance and support for member insurance claims, while a quarter do not provide explicit information about member insurance claims on their website.”

The findings follow sweeping government measures to protect low balance members from what a major Productivity Commission report has described as “zombie” policies.

The Turnbull government in late June introduced to Parliament a bill preventing funds charging fees greater than 3 per cent on members with balances of less than $6,000. It also proposes insurance be provided on an opt-in basis for new members younger than 25, low balance members and those with inactive accounts.

According to the Productivity Commission’s draft report on the super system, a third of superannuation accounts are duplicates and lead to excess fees and “zombie” insurance policies. It put the financial cost of duplicate accounts at $2.6 billion.

Investment Trends described the conflict between the needs of super members, as a whole, and individual approaches to retirement and retirement outcomes as a “key challenge”.

According to modelling by accounting firm KPMG, the opt-in approach to insurance in super could see insurance premiums rise by 26 per cent as funds hike fees to address what it predicts will be substantially lower volumes of uptake.

Anticipating a 50 per cent fall in the levels of group life insurance cover, KPMG said the higher fees could end up eroding balances even more, and especially so for women and low income earners.

“The most heavily impacted categories of erosion of benefits due to default insurance cover are females and low income earners,” KPMG warned.

“For example, considering an increase in insurance premiums of 26 per cent, we estimate the average erosion of account balances for females will increase from 7.6 per cent to 9.0 per cent, and low income earners (<$18,200) to increase from 15.8 per cent to 17.6 per cent.”

The super industry’s sticking point
meeting, discussion
nestegg logo
subscribe to our newsletter sign up
Recommended by Spike Native Network
just wondering - Fintech advisers mostly appear to invest in a bundle of ETF's. You don't mention about the additional potentials risks of ETF investments over direct.......
Mort Schwartzbord - It was always apparent from the initial announcement by Labor that the abolition of negative gearing claims would apply to all investments. This will.......
Maureen - Perhaps the change is a reflection of age. Y0unger people are not as charitable as previous generations. The older people who used to give are now.......
Ian S Falconer - The Grattan Institute have again demonstrated that they are totally out of touch with the real world.
There are 'ooo's of self employed people who.......