Powered by momentummedia
nestegg logo
Powered by momentummedia
nestegg logo
nestegg logo

Retirement

Ouch: Super insurance fees could surge 26 per cent

By Lucy Dean · June 26 2018
Reading:
egg
egg
egg
Surge, arrow up
Ouch: Super insurance fees could surge 26 per cent

Ouch: Super insurance fees could surge 26 per cent

author image
By Lucy Dean · June 26 2018
Reading:
egg
egg
egg
Surge, arrow up

Touted as a way to protect against balance erosion, an opt-in approach to insurance in super could instead see insurance premiums rise 26 per cent, new modelling suggests.

According to modelling by big four accounting firm KPMG, the shift to make insurance in super an opt-in question for those younger than 25, those with inactive accounts and those with balances of less than $6,000 could see other savers stung with a potential premium hike of 26 per cent.

KPMG said the proposal, outlined in the 2018-19 budget, would see a 50 per cent fall in the levels of group life insurance cover and a 42 per cent fall in insurance premiums collections. The firm said this would have an “adverse impact” on premiums, with the shortfall prompting a hike in premiums.

Noting that the outcome at retirement is subject to future changes, KPMG said there were two potential outcomes. The first, in which premiums aren’t increased, would see fee-led balance erosion fall from 6.2 per cent to 5.8 per cent.

However, if premiums were to increase by the anticipated 26 per cent, the average erosion would rise to 7.3 per cent.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“The most heavily impacted categories of erosion of benefits due to default insurance cover are females and low income earners,” KPMG warned.

“For example, considering an increase in insurance premiums of 26 per cent, we estimate the average erosion of account balances for females will increase from 7.6 per cent to 9.0 per cent and low income earners (<$18,200) to increase from 15.8 per cent to 17.6 per cent.”

The firm said the changes would have both intended and unintended “material impacts”, and would leave women and low income earners “worse off”.

Forward this article to a friend. Follow us on Linkedin. Join us on Facebook. Find us on Twitter for the latest updates
Rate the article
author image

About the author

Join The Nest Egg community

We Translate Complicated Financial Jargon Into Easy-To-Understand Information For Australians

Your email address will be shared with nestegg and subject to our Privacy Policy

From the web

Recommended by Spike Native Network

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.

Copyright © 2019 MOMENTUM MEDIA