Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by momentummedia
nestegg logo

Retirement

Super fund manager in court for misleading members

  • March 19 2020
  • Share

Retirement

Super fund manager in court for misleading members

By Grace Ormsby
March 19 2020

Colonial First State Investments is again the subject of legal action, with the filing of new civil proceedings underway in the Federal Court.

Super fund manager in court for misleading members

author image
  • March 19 2020
  • Share

Colonial First State Investments is again the subject of legal action, with the filing of new civil proceedings underway in the Federal Court.

Super fund manager in court for misleading members

ASIC has announced that it is taking action against Colonial First State Investments Ltd (CFSIL), both in its own capacity and as trustee for Colonial First State FirstChoice Superannuation Trust (FirstChoice Fund).

It comes after a class action was filed on behalf of super fund members by Shine Lawyers against Colonial First State earlier this year for erosion of accounts by excessive insurance premiums

The new proceedings centre around alleged breaches of both the ASIC Act and the Corporations Act and relate to allegations of misleading or deceptive communications with FirstChoice Fund members.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Having commenced the Federal Court proceedings, ASIC is alleging that between March 2014 and August 2016, CFSIL communicated with members of the FirstChoice Fund in a misleading or deceptive manner around the provision of investment directions to stay within CFSIL’s FirstChoice Fund rather than transition to MySuper.

Super fund manager in court for misleading members

Since the Australian government passed amendments to the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) in 2012, trustees – including CFSIL – have been required to offer members default “MySuper” superannuation products.

ASIC has outlined that its case focuses on template letters sent to members, and 46 phone calls based off scripts.

The corporate regulator is also alleging that Colonial First State did not provide a “general advice warning” during phone calls, in breach of the Corporations Act.

“It is notable that a total of 8,605 members provided an investment direction keeping them in their existing product.”

ASIC is arguing that Colonial First State also breached its obligations to members by not ensuring it was doing all things necessary to ensure that the financial services covered by its licence were provided efficiently, honestly and fairly.

According to ASIC, the proceedings will be listed for a first case management conference on a date yet to be fixed with the regulator seeking declarations of breaches and the imposition of civil penalties inclusive of a monetary figure.

The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has acknowledged the civil penalty claim against CFSIL.

CFSIL has outlined that it is currently reviewing ASIC's claim and will provide any update as required. 

Forward this article to a friend. Follow us on Linkedin. Join us on Facebook. Find us on X for the latest updates
Rate the article

About the author

author image

Grace is a journalist on Momentum Media's nestegg. She enjoys being able to provide easy to digest information and practical tips for Australians with regard to their wealth, as well as having a platform on which to engage leading experts and commentators and leverage their insight.

About the author

author image
Grace Ormsby

Grace is a journalist on Momentum Media's nestegg. She enjoys being able to provide easy to digest information and practical tips for Australians with regard to their wealth, as well as having a platform on which to engage leading experts and commentators and leverage their insight.

more on this topic

more on this topic

More articles