Powered by momentummedia
nestegg logo
Powered by momentummedia
nestegg logo
nestegg logo

Retirement

The super industry’s sticking point

By Lucy Dean · July 05 2018
Reading:
egg
egg
egg

Retirement

The super industry’s sticking point

By Lucy Dean
July 05 2018
Reading:
egg
egg
egg
meeting, discussion

The super industry’s sticking point

author image
By Lucy Dean · July 05 2018
Reading:
egg
egg
egg
meeting, discussion

Super funds are getting better at communicating but poor records in protecting low balance members are an ongoing source of friction, a new report has found.

Research firm Investment Trends’ latest member engagement report found that funds are starting to capitalise on the power of social media, mobile apps and online chat to boost engagement, but are still falling down when it comes to member insurance.

“Super funds have enthusiastically promoted insurance to their members, but the lack of urgency among many funds to commit to the Voluntary Code of Practice is beginning to affect their social licence,” said Investment Trends technology analyst Ian Webster.

“Most funds are only gradually accepting their role in protecting low balance members and supporting the member claims process, but AustralianSuper is among the few that have taken early and decisive action.”

He continued, “Among the 44 largest super funds surveyed, roughly half have yet to provide explicit guidance and support for member insurance claims, while a quarter do not provide explicit information about member insurance claims on their website.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

The findings follow sweeping government measures to protect low balance members from what a major Productivity Commission report has described as “zombie” policies.

The Turnbull government in late June introduced to Parliament a bill preventing funds charging fees greater than 3 per cent on members with balances of less than $6,000. It also proposes insurance be provided on an opt-in basis for new members younger than 25, low balance members and those with inactive accounts.

According to the Productivity Commission’s draft report on the super system, a third of superannuation accounts are duplicates and lead to excess fees and “zombie” insurance policies. It put the financial cost of duplicate accounts at $2.6 billion.

Investment Trends described the conflict between the needs of super members, as a whole, and individual approaches to retirement and retirement outcomes as a “key challenge”.

According to modelling by accounting firm KPMG, the opt-in approach to insurance in super could see insurance premiums rise by 26 per cent as funds hike fees to address what it predicts will be substantially lower volumes of uptake.

Anticipating a 50 per cent fall in the levels of group life insurance cover, KPMG said the higher fees could end up eroding balances even more, and especially so for women and low income earners.

“The most heavily impacted categories of erosion of benefits due to default insurance cover are females and low income earners,” KPMG warned.

“For example, considering an increase in insurance premiums of 26 per cent, we estimate the average erosion of account balances for females will increase from 7.6 per cent to 9.0 per cent, and low income earners (<$18,200) to increase from 15.8 per cent to 17.6 per cent.”

The super industry’s sticking point
meeting, discussion
nestegg logo

Forward this article to a friend. Follow us on Linkedin. Join us on Facebook. Find us on Twitter for the latest updates
Rate the article

Join the nestegg community

We Translate Complicated Financial Jargon Into Easy-To-Understand Information For Australians

Your email address will be shared with nestegg and subject to our Privacy Policy

From the web

Recommended by Spike Native Network

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.