Invest
Using the 30/30/3 rule for home buying during uncertain times
Thinking of buying a home? Uncertain economic times may have you double guessing your purchase, but the 30/30/3 rule can help you make this a reality.
Using the 30/30/3 rule for home buying during uncertain times
Thinking of buying a home? Uncertain economic times may have you double guessing your purchase, but the 30/30/3 rule can help you make this a reality.
If you have been looking to buy a house during the pandemic, you are not alone. The record-low mortgage rates (which are not seen to lift any time soon) and the rise of the work-from-home set-up have many aspiring Aussie home buyers and investors considering a home purchase.
Buying a house, either as an owner-occupier or an investor, is always a major investment. However, during uncertain economic times, buyers should take extra precautions to ensure their big buy will not negatively impact their finances.
Compared to the stock market, real estate is a more stable investment because it tends to appreciate over time. However, economic uncertainty has a historically negative effect on the labour market. And if you lose your job or are hit by a pay reduction, you still want to be able to cover the cost of your mortgage, so you do not fall behind on monthly mortgage payments, or worse, face a foreclosure.
If you’re on the fence about purchasing a home and unsure if it’s the best financial choice for you, you may want to consider the more conservative “30/30/3” home-buying rule.

What is the 30/30/3 rule?
To prevent buyers and investors from the stress of purchasing a home or an investment property they can’t afford, the 30/30/3 rule is one of the safest percentage rules they can follow. The rule has three parts:
Rule 1: Spend less than 30 per cent of your gross income on your monthly mortgage payment.
Traditionally, industry experts have a rule of thumb on how much money you should spend on your mortgage; it should not be higher than 30 per cent of your gross income. Your gross income covers all of your pre-tax income from all sources, such as your job, investments and side hustles.
However, with the mortgage rates now at a record low, many buyers are tempted to exceed 30 per cent. This is because they know they will be paying less interest over time.
The real danger to breaking this rule occurs when people choose to buy an even more expensive home on a lower bracket of income.
For example, spending 40 per cent of your monthly $70,000 gross income on a mortgage still leaves you with $28,000 in gross income. Spending 40 per cent of your monthly $10,000 income, however, leaves you with a much smaller cushion to take care of your basic needs.
If you choose to spend more of your income on your mortgage payment, you will have less money to save or invest, and then you will have less of a financial cushion in case of a financial emergency (e.g. losing your job, medical expenses, property maintenance expenses, etc). This means that the more income challenged you are, the safer it is to spend less.
As the saying goes, “it’s better to be safe than sorry”.
Rule 2: Save 30 per cent of the home’s value before buying it.
When it comes to saving for a home deposit, you’ll often hear people bring up a minimum figure of 20 per cent of the property’s price. And while it is not a universal requirement, putting down 20 per cent on a mortgage means you won’t be required to cash out lender's insurance or secure a family guarantee for your home loan.
Before buying a home, have at least 30 per cent of the value of the home saved in cash or other low-risk assets. The 20 percent of the money will be put into the down payment to get the possible interest rate and avoid paying mortgage insurance, while the 10 per cent will be set aside as a cash buffer.
If you lose your job, suffer losses from your other investments, or receive a pay cut, you will have funds while you find a new job or a way to supplement your income. If your property requires an emergency repair or maintenance, you will be able to cover some or all of the cost without taking on an additional loan or incurring credit card debt.
This figure may sound like it is a bit excessive, given that many lenders offer home loans with a lower down payment rate.
But during times of uncertainty, it is better to have a financial buffer. To put things in perspective, a lot of homeowners that ended up with an underwater mortgage (or a home purchase loan with a higher principal than the free-market value of the home) during the 2008 financial crisis had minimal down payments.
Rule No. 3: The price of the property should be no more than 3 times your annual gross income.
This is the fastest way to look for homes in the price range you can afford. It also factors in the down payment percentages and prevents you from overstretching your finances, even with a high down payment price.
For example, if you are earning $100,000 annually, then can afford a home with a price tag of $300, 000 or less.
As mentioned, mortgage rates are at a historic low. However, this is causing an increase in demand, which in turn drives up property prices and consequently affects housing affordability.
If you have a good credit score and low debt-to-income ratio, you might be thinking that you could qualify for a higher home loan amount. And while this may be true, real estate experts advise against taking out the maximum amount of loan for which you qualify.
It’s also important to consider the long-term costs of a more expensive home. The more expensive the home, the more expensive the property taxes and ongoing home maintenance will be.
Loopholes of the 30/30/3 rule
This home purchasing home rule may seem quite stringent, but there are also ways to buy a home without taking out a loan.
If you want to “break” the 30/30/3 rule, you can consider the following options:
- Getting a side hustle to earn more money or to provide financial cushion
- Negotiating a higher salary or securing a new position with a higher income.
- Creating new passive income streams to pay for expenses
- Being exceptionally good to your parents and rich relatives and friends (optional, but might come in handy).
The most important takeaway from this rule is to avoid overextending your finances. At the minimum, the rule can help you have a more disciplined and technical approach to buying a new home, which can end up saving you for future financial hardships and, as a worst-case scenario, total bankruptcy.
Property
Trust, technology and triage: what NSW’s ‘name and shame’ signals for real estate governance
NSW’s latest enforcement action on real estate trust accounts isn’t a one-off embarrassment; it’s a stress test of sector governance. With licences suspended and penalties applied, the message is ...Read more
Property
Vacancy is rising, demand is resilient: A case study in defending yield as Australia’s rental cycle rebalances
After a blistering run, Australia’s rental market is loosening at the edges. Vacancy is edging up off historic lows, rent inflation is set to moderate into 2026, yet underlying demand remains ...Read more
Property
Don’t lose the deposit: A case study in stopping real estate payment fraud — and the ROI for doing it
Deposit redirection scams are quietly eroding buyer savings and agency reputations in Australia’s property market. This case study unpacks how a mid-tier real estate group redesigned its settlement ...Read more
Property
The $12m threshold: Why portfolio value, not property count, now defines Australia’s investor elite
The old yardstick of six properties as shorthand for investment success has been overtaken by a harsher reality: in today’s market, elite status is defined by balance-sheet strength, not asset countRead more
Property
From intuition to instrumentation: How a "two-stakeholder" sales playbook lifted close rates and cut cycle times
High-stakes consumer purchases are increasingly joint decisions. When one partner is under-served, deals stall. This case study follows an Australian real estate group that rebuilt its sales motion ...Read more
Property
Selling in 2025: How to spot bad agents fast—and build an ROI-first vendor playbook
In Australia’s property market, choosing the wrong listing agent isn’t just inconvenient—it’s a textbook principal–agent failure that can wipe tens of thousands off your sale outcomeRead more
Property
Selling in 2026: How to de‑risk your agent choice and protect tens of thousands at settlement
Choosing the wrong selling agent isn’t just an inconvenience — it’s a balance‑sheet risk. In a market where digital discovery is concentrated and AI is recasting how listings are priced and promoted, ...Read more
Property
Rate resilience in Australian housing: why scarce supply is overpowering monetary tightening
Australia’s housing market is defying higher borrowing costs because the binding constraint isn’t demand—it’s supply. Brokers report persistent buyer competition and investor repositioning, while ...Read more
Property
Trust, technology and triage: what NSW’s ‘name and shame’ signals for real estate governance
NSW’s latest enforcement action on real estate trust accounts isn’t a one-off embarrassment; it’s a stress test of sector governance. With licences suspended and penalties applied, the message is ...Read more
Property
Vacancy is rising, demand is resilient: A case study in defending yield as Australia’s rental cycle rebalances
After a blistering run, Australia’s rental market is loosening at the edges. Vacancy is edging up off historic lows, rent inflation is set to moderate into 2026, yet underlying demand remains ...Read more
Property
Don’t lose the deposit: A case study in stopping real estate payment fraud — and the ROI for doing it
Deposit redirection scams are quietly eroding buyer savings and agency reputations in Australia’s property market. This case study unpacks how a mid-tier real estate group redesigned its settlement ...Read more
Property
The $12m threshold: Why portfolio value, not property count, now defines Australia’s investor elite
The old yardstick of six properties as shorthand for investment success has been overtaken by a harsher reality: in today’s market, elite status is defined by balance-sheet strength, not asset countRead more
Property
From intuition to instrumentation: How a "two-stakeholder" sales playbook lifted close rates and cut cycle times
High-stakes consumer purchases are increasingly joint decisions. When one partner is under-served, deals stall. This case study follows an Australian real estate group that rebuilt its sales motion ...Read more
Property
Selling in 2025: How to spot bad agents fast—and build an ROI-first vendor playbook
In Australia’s property market, choosing the wrong listing agent isn’t just inconvenient—it’s a textbook principal–agent failure that can wipe tens of thousands off your sale outcomeRead more
Property
Selling in 2026: How to de‑risk your agent choice and protect tens of thousands at settlement
Choosing the wrong selling agent isn’t just an inconvenience — it’s a balance‑sheet risk. In a market where digital discovery is concentrated and AI is recasting how listings are priced and promoted, ...Read more
Property
Rate resilience in Australian housing: why scarce supply is overpowering monetary tightening
Australia’s housing market is defying higher borrowing costs because the binding constraint isn’t demand—it’s supply. Brokers report persistent buyer competition and investor repositioning, while ...Read more
