The classic portfolio allocation principle suggests that investors should subtract their age from 100. The resulting difference should be invested in stocks or equities and the remaining in bonds or fixed income.

For example, a 35-year old may allocate 65 per cent of their portfolio in stocks and 35 per cent in bonds.

While the allocation principle above has served many investors well enough, the post-global financial crisis (GFC) economy demonstrates that investors need to reconsider this belief.

Determine your risk appetite

The ideal strategy for asset allocation in this uncertain market is to select according to the investor’s risk appetite—or the level of risk they are willing to accept.

To start with, the investor must determine their investment objectives and time horizon to objectively see how much risk they can tolerate.

Investors may start by answering the following questions to have a better idea of how much risk they can or should tolerate depending on their circumstance:

1. What are your investment objectives?
2. How long can you invest in the market? Consider your current age and the age you intend to start an income stream from the invested money. (This may be days, weeks, months or years)
3. What is your priority: capital preservation or capital growth?

   1. Preserve the money

   2.  Generate some income but with the initial investment preserved

   3.  Generate income while exposed to minimal risk

   4.  Generate great income despite exposure to risk

4. If your initial investment loses 20 per cent of its value in the first quarter of your timeline, how likely are you to panic?

   1. I’ll immediately pull out all investments to preserve what’s left of my money.

   2.  One-quarter of my time frame is too short to judge performance.

   3. I’ll tolerate it a bit more, but I would stay alert of red flags.

   4.  20 per cent is a small price to pay for the returns I expect by the end of my time frame. I’ll keep going.

5. What would your choice be if the loss is increased to 35 per cent?

While questions three to five above gives a glimpse of how much risk an investor may be willing to accept with their investments, they should always refer back to their answers to questions one and two to make their investment decisions more objective.

Despite the great appetite for risk, an investor with a short time frame and immediate objectives may be better off with ‘safer’ investments.

Potential assets for your portfolio

An investor’s risk tolerance depends on how an investor perceives how risk affects their investments. Here are some assets that investors may consider adding to their portfolio based on their risk tolerance.

Conservative

Conservative investors usually have a low appetite for risk because their focus is capital preservation. They turn to low-risk investments, not simply out of fear, but to ensure income and evade loss that could be difficult to regain.

Investors with a low tolerance for risk may wish to include the following assets in their portfolio:

• Cash-based
• Fixed-income
• Government bonds
• Positively geared properties

Cash-based
Cash-based investments refer to traditional savings and checking accounts, as well as high-interest online savings accounts.

These accounts earn a steady but low interest and are ideal for investors who want to retain liquidity and prefer their cash to be accessible anytime.

Fixed-income
These are cash-based investments that generate fixed returns over a lock-in period, such as a time deposit or certificate of deposit.

These products require the investor to keep their money with an accredited deposit-taking institution (ADI) over an agreed period in exchange for regular interest payments until maturity.

Government bonds
Investors with a low-risk appetite may also consider adding Australian government bonds (AGBs) to their portfolio because it is believed to be the most stable of the debt securities in the market. The interest rates and returns are lower than other bonds, but investors are exposed to fewer risks.

Positively geared properties
Real estate may be the most illiquid of investments but a well-researched positively geared property, regardless if it is residential or held as an investment, can give investors both income and tax benefits.

Moderate or balanced

Investors with a moderate or balanced risk appetite usually want both capital growth and preservation. Many moderately aggressive investors are investing for the medium or long-term, hence, they have a slightly higher tolerance when it comes to facing immediate but short downturns.

Their portfolios are usually a mix of aggressive and conservative investments, such as the following assets:

• Corporate bonds
• Shares
• Real estate investment trusts (REITs)

Corporate bonds
Investors who are fine with taking on a little extra risk in exchange for a higher fixed income may take advantage of corporate bonds. Corporate bonds usually have better returns that AGBs, albeit with a slightly higher risk.

Shares
Investors with a low appetite for risk or have shorter time horizons usually shy away from the share market because losses from downturns could be difficult to regain. Moderately aggressive investors who have both tolerance and time may benefit from adding shares to their portfolio.

Real estate investment trusts (REITs)
Investors may access large-scale investment properties in the local sphere or international markets through the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX). REITs can give regular income from the underlying properties’ retained earnings, but listed REITs may also be negatively affected by rising interest rates.

Aggressive

Aggressive investors focus on gaining higher incomes in a short period and mostly select assets that promise greater capital growth in exchange for accepting higher risks.

Shares
Shares are exposed to market volatility but, if well-selected, they are a great addition to any portfolio that seeks capital growth.

High-risk bonds
High-risk bonds include corporate bonds with high credit risk issuers and junk bonds.

It is still best for investors to discuss their portfolio with a licensed professional who can give expert investment advice based on the investor’s personal circumstances.

This information has been sourced from Nest Egg.

About the author

Louise is a content producer for Momentum Media’s nestegg who likes keeping up-to-date with all the ways people can work towards financial stability in 2019. She also enjoys turning complex information into easy-to-digest, practical tips to help those who want to achieve financial independence.

About the author

Louise is a content producer for Momentum Media’s nestegg who likes keeping up-to-date with all the ways people can work towards financial stability in 2019. She also enjoys turning complex information into easy-to-digest, practical tips to help those who want to achieve financial independence.

Louise is a content producer for Momentum Media’s nestegg who likes keeping up-to-date with all the ways people can work towards financial stability in 2019. She also enjoys turning complex information into easy-to-digest, practical tips to help those who want to achieve financial independence.

more on this topic

Property

Zagga's ninth anniversary sees focus on investor education in real estate private credit

In a significant milestone, Zagga, a key player in the Australian real estate sector, is celebrating its ninth anniversary with a renewed commitment to investor education. The company has grown ...Read more

Property

Australian property’s quiet pivot: resilience hides a new competitive map

Australia’s housing market remains sturdier than the macro noise suggests, but the sources of resilience have shifted. For operators, the profit pool is migrating from ‘volume at any price’ to ...Read more

Property

Gen Z’s 5% deposit rush: how policy‑driven demand is reshaping Australia’s housing value chain

A government-backed 5% deposit guarantee has triggered a surge in first-home buyer intent among Gen Z, pulling forward demand and resetting competition across banks, brokers and buildersRead more

Property

Cautious bidders, smarter sellers: a Queensland auction case study on repricing risk

Queensland’s auction market has hit a caution cycle as buyers price in higher borrowing costs, global uncertainty and cost-of-living pressure. Clearance softness is forcing agencies to re-engineer ...Read more

Property

Trust, technology and triage: what NSW’s ‘name and shame’ signals for real estate governance

NSW’s latest enforcement action on real estate trust accounts isn’t a one-off embarrassment; it’s a stress test of sector governance. With licences suspended and penalties applied, the message is ...Read more

Property

Vacancy is rising, demand is resilient: A case study in defending yield as Australia’s rental cycle rebalances

After a blistering run, Australia’s rental market is loosening at the edges. Vacancy is edging up off historic lows, rent inflation is set to moderate into 2026, yet underlying demand remains ...Read more

Property

Don’t lose the deposit: A case study in stopping real estate payment fraud — and the ROI for doing it

Deposit redirection scams are quietly eroding buyer savings and agency reputations in Australia’s property market. This case study unpacks how a mid-tier real estate group redesigned its settlement ...Read more

Property

The $12m threshold: Why portfolio value, not property count, now defines Australia’s investor elite

The old yardstick of six properties as shorthand for investment success has been overtaken by a harsher reality: in today’s market, elite status is defined by balance-sheet strength, not asset countRead more