Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter sign up

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.

Industry Super takes aim at failing SMSFs

Industry Super Australia has warned that SMSFs with balances under $2 million are falling “seriously short”, with some reaping negative returns of nearly -17 per cent.

According to Industry Super Australia’s (ISA) paper, ATO self-managed super funds: a statistical overview 2015-2016, until SMSFs contain multimillion-dollar assets, they run the risk of making poor or negative returns.

Marking the release of the report on Monday, ISA argued that while SMSFs with more than $2 million earned a “healthy 4.3 per cent” over the financial year, those with less than $500,000 made between zero per cent for those with assets of $200,000-$500,000, and -16.7 per cent for funds with assets of less than $50,000.

Further, according to ISA’s analysis, for SMSFs with assets between $1 million and $2 million, returns at 2.2 per cent fell below the 2016 APRA-regulated fund average of 2.9 per cent, and well below the industry super fund 4.1 per cent average.

Advertisement
Advertisement

These numbers fall in line with the five-year average to 2016, in which APRA-regulated funds made average annual returns of 7.4 per cent, SMSFs with assets above $2 million made an average 5.6 per cent, those with $1.2 million made an average 4.5 per cent and those from $500,000-$1 million made an average 3.7 per cent.

SMSFs with balances below $200,000 made negative returns.

To ISA chief economist, Dr Stephen Anthony, the data suggests that SMSFs aren’t as suitable for “ordinary Australians”.

He said, “SMSFs with assets over $2 million on average generally performed on par with APRA regulated funds and underperformed industry funds, but medium to smaller ones showed appalling returns.

“The pattern is clear: the less you have, the worse you perform.”

He continued, commenting that smaller SMSFs also cop higher expense ratios of above 6 per cent.

Dr Anthony explained, “The administration costs of running an SMSF with a small balance are often too high.

“It’s important to know how your super fund stacks up on fees and net returns – otherwise you could be in for an unpleasant surprise.”

Industry Super takes aim at failing SMSFs
nestegg logo
subscribe to our newsletter sign up
FROM THE WEB
Recommended by Spike Native Network
Anonymous - This is all identity politics rubbish. Inasmuch as most families are dual income earners and as most women are not in high paying jobs for a variety.......
Margaret - Happy that I won't be around in 2060....
Anonymous - This "analysis" is misconceived and should get a fail in statistics. Men pay more tax because they work more. So they should get more relief. And,.......
Anonymous - I'm not sure how the ATO can declare there is an "$8.7 Billion hole" without already being able to confirm that all these claims are illegitimate?

Is.......