Powered by momentummedia
nestegg logo
Powered by momentummedia
nestegg logo
nestegg logo

Retirement

Super changes could hit high balance savers the hardest: APRA

By Lucy Dean · July 20 2018
Reading:
egg
egg
egg

Retirement

Super changes could hit high balance savers the hardest: APRA

By Lucy Dean
July 20 2018
Reading:
egg
egg
egg
high balance savers, APRA, higher fees

Super changes could hit high balance savers the hardest: APRA

author image
By Lucy Dean · July 20 2018
Reading:
egg
egg
egg
high balance savers, APRA, higher fees

Savers with higher super balances could suffer higher fees under the government’s proposed changes, the prudential regulator has warned while calling for a more measured approach.

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has expressed concern this morning that changes aimed at making super friendlier to low balance members could come at the expense of higher balance members. The proposals could also inadvertently strip low balance members of insurance coverage if funds stumble on the communication front, APRA warned.

The regulator suggested a staggered implementation approach to allow sufficient time to communicate and establish the changes introduced in the 2018-18 federal budget.

In her opening statement to the Senate economics legislation committee today, deputy chairman Helen Rowell said the government’s proposal to limit fees charged to members with balances of less than $6,000 could trigger higher fees for those above the threshold.

Likewise, the proposal to make insurance in superannuation an opt-in process for members younger than 25 and low-balance members could also see higher premiums on the remaining insured members, as KPMG noted last month. The accounting firm put the rate hike at as high as 26 per cent. 

Advertisement
Advertisement

“Members impacted by the insurance proposal will need to be made fully aware of the changes to enable them to appropriately consider their insurance needs and the consequences of not opting-in to insurance. Effective member communication is therefore paramount,” Ms Rowell said.

She said that while APRA generally supports the proposals, communication will be a critical factor.

“The proposal to require the transfer of accounts of less than $6,000 that have not received a contribution for 13 months to the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) will reduce account erosion by removing duplicate accounts,” Ms Rowell said.

“It will be particularly important to ensure that inactive account members are aware that their accounts may be moved to the ATO, and their insurance cover consequently ceased, if they fail to make an active contribution or an active decision regarding their insurance.”

With this in mind, she suggested the 1 July 2019 implementation date could be too ambitious for what will be a complicated and involved process for the $2.6 trillion industry.

“Sufficient time also needs to be allowed for effective communication to members of the changes that are being made, their expected impact and the decisions that members may need to make (particularly in relation to insurance),” Ms Rowell added.

“APRA is therefore concerned that unintended consequences may arise for members and there will be significant pressure on, and heightened operational risk for, superannuation funds and their insurers and administrators, if sufficient time is not allowed to implement the proposals in an appropriate and orderly manner.”

Super changes could hit high balance savers the hardest: APRA
high balance savers, APRA, higher fees
nestegg logo

Forward this article to a friend. Follow us on Linkedin. Join us on Facebook. Find us on Twitter for the latest updates
Rate the article

Join the nestegg community

We Translate Complicated Financial Jargon Into Easy-To-Understand Information For Australians

Your email address will be shared with nestegg and subject to our Privacy Policy

From the web

Recommended by Spike Native Network

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.