Retirement
SMSFs warned on quirks with personal guarantees, contributions
Given that COVID-19 could see increased instances of lenders calling upon personal guarantees for SMSF loans, an industry lawyer has outlined where a contribution might arise in these types of scenarios.
Given the economic circumstances and the impact of COVID-19, there may be situations with limited recourse borrowing arrangements where the bank or lender calls upon the guarantee where there are defaults on repayments, said DBA Lawyers special counsel Daniel Butler.
“You only need to think about a lot of the off-the-plan purchases that were previously made. I doubt many would have experienced much capital appreciation and there could be a few that have gone under water,” Mr Figot said.
In these situations, it is entirely possible that the lender may call upon the guarantee, he said.
Mr Figot reminded SMSF professionals that where the guarantor pays the lender, it is not deemed to be a contribution where the guarantor, under the right of subrogation, then stands in the shoes of the lender and pursues the SMSF on an arm’s-length basis.
“Therefore, if the SMSF is retaining the asset, the guarantor should attempt to recover the amount from the SMSF by forcing the asset to be sold, for example, taking the proceeds or taking over the asset,” he explained.
“But what happens where the lender has forced the sale of the asset?”
Mr Figot said this is probably the most common circumstance where the loan runs into difficulty.
“However, what if the lender forces the asset to be sold and takes the proceeds or just takes the asset, the guarantor pays the lender for the shortfall and guarantor doesn’t attempt to recover from the SMSF on an arm’s-length basis?” he said.
“The ATO actually says there is no contribution in that situation. They say that there is no contribution if the SMSF trustee has exercised a right to walk away from the arrangement and has lost the acquirable asset to the lender and has no further liability, but the lender still exercises a right to call on the guarantee for a shortfall after disposal of the original asset.”
He gave an example of an SMSF that used an LRBA to buy an asset that has since decreased in value. The asset is worth $800,000 but the loan is worth $1 million and the SMSF member provided a personal guarantee.
“Let’s say the bank pursues the SMSF for the $800,000 asset and the bank then pursues the member for $200,00 but the member doesn’t pursue the SMSF. [In this situation], this is not a deemed contribution,” he explained.
SMSFs warned on quirks with personal guarantees, contributions
Given that COVID-19 could see increased instances of lenders calling upon personal guarantees for SMSF loans, an industry lawyer has outlined where a contribution might arise in these types of scenarios.
Given the economic circumstances and the impact of COVID-19, there may be situations with limited recourse borrowing arrangements where the bank or lender calls upon the guarantee where there are defaults on repayments, said DBA Lawyers special counsel Daniel Butler.
“You only need to think about a lot of the off-the-plan purchases that were previously made. I doubt many would have experienced much capital appreciation and there could be a few that have gone under water,” Mr Figot said.
In these situations, it is entirely possible that the lender may call upon the guarantee, he said.
Mr Figot reminded SMSF professionals that where the guarantor pays the lender, it is not deemed to be a contribution where the guarantor, under the right of subrogation, then stands in the shoes of the lender and pursues the SMSF on an arm’s-length basis.
“Therefore, if the SMSF is retaining the asset, the guarantor should attempt to recover the amount from the SMSF by forcing the asset to be sold, for example, taking the proceeds or taking over the asset,” he explained.
“But what happens where the lender has forced the sale of the asset?”
Mr Figot said this is probably the most common circumstance where the loan runs into difficulty.
“However, what if the lender forces the asset to be sold and takes the proceeds or just takes the asset, the guarantor pays the lender for the shortfall and guarantor doesn’t attempt to recover from the SMSF on an arm’s-length basis?” he said.
“The ATO actually says there is no contribution in that situation. They say that there is no contribution if the SMSF trustee has exercised a right to walk away from the arrangement and has lost the acquirable asset to the lender and has no further liability, but the lender still exercises a right to call on the guarantee for a shortfall after disposal of the original asset.”
He gave an example of an SMSF that used an LRBA to buy an asset that has since decreased in value. The asset is worth $800,000 but the loan is worth $1 million and the SMSF member provided a personal guarantee.
“Let’s say the bank pursues the SMSF for the $800,000 asset and the bank then pursues the member for $200,00 but the member doesn’t pursue the SMSF. [In this situation], this is not a deemed contribution,” he explained.
Given that COVID-19 could see increased instances of lenders calling upon personal guarantees for SMSF loans, an industry lawyer has outlined where a contribution might arise in these types of scenarios.
Given the economic circumstances and the impact of COVID-19, there may be situations with limited recourse borrowing arrangements where the bank or lender calls upon the guarantee where there are defaults on repayments, said DBA Lawyers special counsel Daniel Butler.
“You only need to think about a lot of the off-the-plan purchases that were previously made. I doubt many would have experienced much capital appreciation and there could be a few that have gone under water,” Mr Figot said.
In these situations, it is entirely possible that the lender may call upon the guarantee, he said.
Mr Figot reminded SMSF professionals that where the guarantor pays the lender, it is not deemed to be a contribution where the guarantor, under the right of subrogation, then stands in the shoes of the lender and pursues the SMSF on an arm’s-length basis.
“Therefore, if the SMSF is retaining the asset, the guarantor should attempt to recover the amount from the SMSF by forcing the asset to be sold, for example, taking the proceeds or taking over the asset,” he explained.
“But what happens where the lender has forced the sale of the asset?”
Mr Figot said this is probably the most common circumstance where the loan runs into difficulty.
“However, what if the lender forces the asset to be sold and takes the proceeds or just takes the asset, the guarantor pays the lender for the shortfall and guarantor doesn’t attempt to recover from the SMSF on an arm’s-length basis?” he said.
“The ATO actually says there is no contribution in that situation. They say that there is no contribution if the SMSF trustee has exercised a right to walk away from the arrangement and has lost the acquirable asset to the lender and has no further liability, but the lender still exercises a right to call on the guarantee for a shortfall after disposal of the original asset.”
He gave an example of an SMSF that used an LRBA to buy an asset that has since decreased in value. The asset is worth $800,000 but the loan is worth $1 million and the SMSF member provided a personal guarantee.
“Let’s say the bank pursues the SMSF for the $800,000 asset and the bank then pursues the member for $200,00 but the member doesn’t pursue the SMSF. [In this situation], this is not a deemed contribution,” he explained.
Self managed super fund
Superannuation guarantee to be paid on government paid parental leave, says ASFA
The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has hailed the government's decision to include Superannuation Guarantee payments with its Paid Parental Leave policy as a critical step ...Read more
Self managed super fund
SMSF experts advise against hasty reactions to potential super tax changes
As the Australian Government proposes a new tax measure on superannuation earnings for balances exceeding $3 million, experts from the self-managed super funds (SMSF) sector are urging members not to ...Read more
Self managed super fund
Federal government announces changes to superannuation contribution caps
The Federal Government has announced changes to the superannuation contribution caps, impacting self-managed super funds (SMSFs) and their members from 1 July 2024. Read more
Self managed super fund
SMSF Association calls for joint effort to tackle early super access
The SMSF Association is calling on a collaborative approach including the Government, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO), the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), and the ...Read more
Self managed super fund
Rest Super members file class action over alleged insurance premium deductions
Shine Lawyers has initiated a class action lawsuit against Rest Superannuation (Rest), alleging the unlawful deduction of income protection insurance premiums from members' superannuation accounts. Read more
Self managed super fund
Debunking a superannuation tax myth: SMSF Association clarifies the impact on Aussie farms
In the ongoing debate about a proposed new tax targeting superannuation funds exceeding $3 million, the SMSF Association has stepped in to challenge claims from the Association of Superannuation Funds ...Read more
Self managed super fund
Is an SMSF right for you?
When it comes to planning for retirement, one of the most significant decisions Australians have to make is how to manage their superannuation. Read more
Self managed super fund
SMSF growth continues after pandemic peak
The statistics have begun to change coming out of the COVID-19 pandemic, according to new findings from Australian Investment Exchange Limited (AUSIEX). Read more
Self managed super fund
Superannuation guarantee to be paid on government paid parental leave, says ASFA
The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has hailed the government's decision to include Superannuation Guarantee payments with its Paid Parental Leave policy as a critical step ...Read more
Self managed super fund
SMSF experts advise against hasty reactions to potential super tax changes
As the Australian Government proposes a new tax measure on superannuation earnings for balances exceeding $3 million, experts from the self-managed super funds (SMSF) sector are urging members not to ...Read more
Self managed super fund
Federal government announces changes to superannuation contribution caps
The Federal Government has announced changes to the superannuation contribution caps, impacting self-managed super funds (SMSFs) and their members from 1 July 2024. Read more
Self managed super fund
SMSF Association calls for joint effort to tackle early super access
The SMSF Association is calling on a collaborative approach including the Government, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO), the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), and the ...Read more
Self managed super fund
Rest Super members file class action over alleged insurance premium deductions
Shine Lawyers has initiated a class action lawsuit against Rest Superannuation (Rest), alleging the unlawful deduction of income protection insurance premiums from members' superannuation accounts. Read more
Self managed super fund
Debunking a superannuation tax myth: SMSF Association clarifies the impact on Aussie farms
In the ongoing debate about a proposed new tax targeting superannuation funds exceeding $3 million, the SMSF Association has stepped in to challenge claims from the Association of Superannuation Funds ...Read more
Self managed super fund
Is an SMSF right for you?
When it comes to planning for retirement, one of the most significant decisions Australians have to make is how to manage their superannuation. Read more
Self managed super fund
SMSF growth continues after pandemic peak
The statistics have begun to change coming out of the COVID-19 pandemic, according to new findings from Australian Investment Exchange Limited (AUSIEX). Read more