Retirement
Is the government misleading consumers when it comes to retirement?
Industry Super Australia has accused the Morrison government of misleading consumers when it comes to financial outcomes in retirement.

Is the government misleading consumers when it comes to retirement?
Industry Super Australia has accused the Morrison government of misleading consumers when it comes to financial outcomes in retirement.

As part of the Retirement Income Covenant starting from 1 July 2022, the government is seeking to further develop the retirement outcomes in Australia’s superannuation framework and address the findings of the Retirement Income Review.
As part of this move, it has asked super funds to develop a strategy to make it easier for members to take money out of their super in retirement.
Drawing on research released during the Retirement Income Review, the Morrison government’s Retirement Income Covenant paper highlighted that $1 in every $3 in the super system will be passed down to the next generation by 2060.
“This raises the question as to whether the answer to lifting the retirement incomes of Australians is more superannuation savings or better guidance about how to maximise their superannuation savings during their retirement,” Treasurer Josh Frydenberg previously said.
As such, the paper argues that retirees should be encouraged to spend their superannuation instead of handing down a large portion of their nest egg to their families.
However, the Industry Super Australia (ISA) has come out swinging, questioning the government’s maths and arguing that most retirees outlive their super.
“Using HILDA data [Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia] show that 80 per cent of people aged 60 and over and 90 per cent of people aged 80 and over who died in the period 2014 to 2018 had no super at all in the period of up to four years before death,” the ISA said in its submission to government.
Dispelling the government’s concerns about older Australians building up large super balances, the group stated that of those currently aged 80 and above, only 5 per cent have a balance of $110,000 or more in their superannuation.
In a separate submission, the ASFA drew attention to data from the Australian Taxation Office, which revealed that around 1.7 million Australians aged 70 and over have no superannuation, or in other words, over 60 per cent of those aged 70 and over have no super.
There’s not a one-size-fits-all approach to retirement
In a nutshell, the government believes retirees have too much super, while industry funds claim they don’t have enough.
Adding to the debate, Super Consumers Australia believes current retirement targets are out of reach for typical Aussies, leaving them disengaged with their super.
As such, director Xavier O’Halloran has urged the government to acknowledge the different retirement strategies Australians need.
According to Super Consumers, Australians fall into one of three distinct cohorts of retirement thinkers – engaged delegates (25 per cent), engaged DIY (37 per cent) and the disengaged (38 per cent).
With each group said to be practicing a different approach to their retirement, Mr O’Halloran concluded that Aussies need more specific support.
“We do a lot more to support people during their working lives to find the best products for their super with
quality filters and comparable independent guidance about the quality of products. We need to give the same assistance to people planning for retirement,” he added.
The ISA agreed, highlighting the importance of strong financial default products for members with lower engagement.
“It has long been ISA’s position that in a compulsory superannuation system with poor financial literacy, most members should be able to rely on default settings that protect their interests without recourse to personal advice,” they state.
‘Self-interested voices in this debate’
According to Super Consumers Australia’s submission, self-interested voices are driving the debate instead of focusing on what is best for retirees.
“At the moment, we’re seeing people switch off due to fear when confronted by unrealistic and frankly unnecessary retirement savings targets,” Mr O’Halloran said.
“There are some self-interested voices in this debate quoting the need for a million dollars in savings. It makes an attractive headline, but this isn’t what the majority of Australians who are just looking to maintain their standard of living in retirement need to hear.”
About the author

About the author


Retirement Planning
New govt called on to improve retirement and super systems
The organisation has called for action from the new government. ...Read more

Retirement Planning
Aged care v retirement village: Which is better?
What is the difference between aged care and retirement villages? Aged care facilities provide retirees with accommodation that has daily medical and personal care services. Retirement villages allow...Read more

Retirement Planning
Aussies lag on retirement optimism
Australians are mostly looking up when it comes to leaving the workforce, but they lag behind their counterparts. ...Read more

Retirement Planning
1 in 2 Aussie retirees now expect their savings to outlast them
Those nearing retirement are starting to ask the right questions. ...Read more

Retirement Planning
Less than half of super fund members expect a comfortable retirement
The older you are, the more likely you are to feel optimistic about retiring from the workforce. ...Read more

Retirement Planning
Is it time for retirees to retire the 4% rule?
New economic realities are challenging long-held assumptions about how retirees should tap into their wealth. ...Read more

Retirement Planning
Modern retirement means more than just spending time with the grandkids
How are today’s retirees really spending their time and money? ...Read more

Retirement Planning
Retirement costs spike at the fastest rate in over a decade
Retirees have been hit hard by higher living costs, including fuel prices and property rates. ...Read more

Wrapping up an eventful 2021
Listen now

What Omicron means for property, and are units right for first-time buyers? What is equity crowdfunding? Are industry super funds tapping into member funds to save their skins?
Listen now

Will housing affordability improve in 2022? Will buy now, pay later become the norm? Why are Aussies staying in failing super products?
Listen now

Who really benefits from crypto ETFs? How will the RBA respond to rising inflation? Could a mandate help address unpaid super?
Listen now

Retirement Planning
New govt called on to improve retirement and super systems
The organisation has called for action from the new government. ...Read more

Retirement Planning
Aged care v retirement village: Which is better?
What is the difference between aged care and retirement villages? Aged care facilities provide retirees with accommodation that has daily medical and personal care services. Retirement villages allow...Read more

Retirement Planning
Aussies lag on retirement optimism
Australians are mostly looking up when it comes to leaving the workforce, but they lag behind their counterparts. ...Read more

Retirement Planning
1 in 2 Aussie retirees now expect their savings to outlast them
Those nearing retirement are starting to ask the right questions. ...Read more

Retirement Planning
Less than half of super fund members expect a comfortable retirement
The older you are, the more likely you are to feel optimistic about retiring from the workforce. ...Read more

Retirement Planning
Is it time for retirees to retire the 4% rule?
New economic realities are challenging long-held assumptions about how retirees should tap into their wealth. ...Read more

Retirement Planning
Modern retirement means more than just spending time with the grandkids
How are today’s retirees really spending their time and money? ...Read more

Retirement Planning
Retirement costs spike at the fastest rate in over a decade
Retirees have been hit hard by higher living costs, including fuel prices and property rates. ...Read more