Speaking at a panel event for the 27th Colloquium on Pensions and Retirement Research in Sydney on Tuesday, retirement review panellist Deborah Ralston said it was a misconception amongst some in the retirement income sector that the review would not include the family home.

“We talk in the [discussion] paper about the three pillars of the retirement system, and I noted a comment from someone saying you haven’t got the fourth pillar in there, which is housing, but actually that falls under voluntary savings,” Dr Ralston said.

“So the three key pillars are the age pension, compulsory super and voluntary savings, including voluntary super, the home, investment properties, financial and non-financial assets.”

However, Dr Ralston clarified that the review would not seek to make specific recommendations about tweaks to the retirement income system but would be “drawing conclusions on the basis of the analysis that we collect”, including several pieces of independent research as well as community submissions.

Despite Treasurer Josh Frydenberg having ruled out including the family home in the pension assets test when announcing the retirement review in September, Council of the Ageing Australia chief executive Ian Yates said it was preferable that all options be on the table for the fact-based review.

“We do have a situation where there are a lot of fixed positions that are not necessarily driven by evidence, or where evidence is corralled around a predetermined position, and I don’t exempt some of my colleagues in advocacy organisations in the sector from that,” Mr Yates said.

“Our hope is that the review will lay the groundwork for community debate on major issues, even those that are politically sensitive.”

Mr Yates said the mindset of retirees was changing when it came to a possible partial inclusion of high-value properties in the pension means test.

“The place of the principal residence in the means test is a discussion that I think there is room for having more than people think,” he said.

“We regularly survey our constituency and we have asked them from time to time what their view is about including part of the value of a home that is worth more than the average in the pension assets means test.

“The constituency has responded 50-50 yes and no, so that tells me they are divided, but it also tells me there is a conversation to be had.”

more on this topic

Retirement Planning

Young educators prioritise retirement over home ownership and family planning

In a significant shift from traditional financial priorities, young educators in Australia are placing greater emphasis on saving for retirement over other life milestones such as home ownership, ...Read more

Retirement Planning

Retirement happiness on the rise, but cost-of-living worries cloud confidence

Australians aged 60 and over are generally positive about their retirement, but concerns about the rising cost of living continue to impact their lifestyle and financial security, according to the ...Read more

Retirement Planning

Australia's retirement system nears tipping point as withdrawals surpass contributions

State Street has unveiled a significant new research series, "Reimagining Retirement," which highlights a critical juncture for Australia's retirement system. The study, released on 1 April 2026, ...Read more

Retirement Planning

Online wills initiative aims to boost superannuation and retirement engagement

In a bid to increase engagement with superannuation and retirement planning, Aware Super has expanded its online wills service, following a successful pilot program. The initiative, launched in ...Read more

Retirement Planning

New digital platform revolutionises retirement planning for Aware Super members

A groundbreaking digital platform by Aware Super is transforming the way retirees plan and manage their pensions, with significant results already seen in the pilot phase. The tool, named Retirement ...Read more

Retirement Planning

The retirement mortgage squeeze: how one bank turned a demographic risk into a strategic edge

An increasing share of Australians are entering their 60s still paying off mortgages, just as living costs and interest charges stay stubbornly high. For banks, super funds, retailers and ...Read more

Retirement Planning

The retirement mortgage crunch: what it means for banks, retailers and policy in Australia

A growing share of Australians are carrying mortgages into their 60s and beyond, colliding with persistent cost-of-living pressures and a “slow grind” macro outlook. This isn’t just a social story; it ...Read more

Retirement Planning

Majority of Australians still unsure about their retirement prospects

A recent survey conducted by MFS Investment Management® has shed light on the ongoing uncertainty faced by many Australians regarding their retirement plans. Despite a slight increase in confidence ...Read more