Forget the kombucha, take up chess!
In news sure to thrill chess players around the world, a new study has revealed elite chess players tend to live up to 14 years longer than the general population.
The research from the ARC Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research (CEPAR) compared the life expectancy of the general population with elite players and Olympic athletes.
The research, which compared the survival rates of 1,208 chess players around the world with the general population, found top chess players can outlive their non-elite chess-playing peers by up to 14 years.
“What sparked our interest in this topic have been media reports that the stress of the chess game can increase mortality. For example, the death of two players at a major chess tournament in Norway in 2014 was interpreted as being due to stress of the game,” said Professor Philip Clarke, CEPAR chief investigator.
“We thought that the relationship between playing chess and mortality needed much more systematic analysis – to examine the overall impact of being a top chess player we obtained information on all current chess Grandmasters and compared their life expectancy with a matched rate of mortality in the general population for each country they represented.”
He said the results debunk the theory that elite chess-players die earlier.
CEPAR senior research fellow Dr An Duy Tran added, “The positive effects of chess on longevity are particularly interesting in an era in which the so-called ‘mind sports’, like chess, poker and competitive video games, have become highly professionalised.
“The elite mental athletes in our study had a substantially higher life expectancy than the general population.
“There may be potential direct health benefits of chess expertise, with evidence suggesting that playing chess can reduce the risk of dementia, as well as physically alter the structure of the brain.”
When comparing with Olympic medallists, it found chess Grandmasters have the same protracted life expectancies.
Seriously, though
However, as chess players and the population at large lives longer, there’s a growing need for retirement income products that protect against increased life spans.
Recognising this, the government last week introduced the requirement for super funds to provide at least one “flagship” comprehensive income product for retirement (CIPR).
This move has been controversial, with Sunsuper national manager Ray Murray describing it as “actuarial fraud”.
Join The Nest Egg community
We Translate Complicated Financial Jargon Into Easy-To-Understand Information For Australians
Your email address will be shared with nestegg and subject to our Privacy Policy
Join The Nest Egg community
We Translate Complicated Financial Jargon Into Easy-To-Understand Information For Australians
Your email address will be shared with nestegg and subject to our Privacy Policy
New review to probe ‘3 pillars’ of retirement income
Providing for a spouse after death
Franklin family woes reminiscent of wider estate planning issue
The importance of financial literacy
Your accountant may soon provide financial advice too
New call to lower the age pension assets test taper
most viewed
Superannuation
Super fund slammed at Shonkys 2019
Shares
Gen Z women shaking up the sharemarket scene
Cryptocurrency
In 2019, Boomers boast the biggest uptake of crypto trading
Property
‘Horrible’ and high-risk: Is an apartment a good investment?
Listen to
What the heck is with robots and tech - ETFs explained
More podcasts
Find super’s sweet spot
Website Notifications
Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.