That’s according to the Property Council of Australia, which in its 2018-19 pre-budget submission, said the government should consider launching a “Government Ageing Transition Strategy”, to educate and aid older Australians in the move to retirement.

Speaking on the submission last week, the Property Council’s chief executive Ken Morrison said: “Policies that recognise the value of rightsizing and provide financial certainty will… address housing affordability and will ensure older Australians can access housing that meets their needs.”

The Council made four recommendations; that the budget “recognise the value of rightsizing”, that it improves seniors’ awareness of the available housing options, that it ensures “clear and expert advice” is available and that seniors’ have financial certainty should they choose to rightsize.

The submission argued that it’s important that the idea of rightsizing is normalised and that retirement villages should be a feature of policy considerations for rightsizing.

“[It] should also include other forms of housing, care delivery, cities planning, aged pension eligibility rules and taxation.

“The Retirement Living Council recommends the government undertakes a Seniors’ Housing Supply Study to investigate and make recommendations on supply and demand issues for purpose-built and managed housing options for older Australians.”

Continuing, the Council said the government should consider awareness campaigns to normalise rightsizing. It argued that such campaigns would “encourage people to plan a transition from larger homes before these decisions are overtaken by critical health incidents”.

However, the Council conceded that the move to retirement living comes with a “complex set of decisions” in terms of how a lower entry price could impact pension eligibility and whether other properties may grant seniors access to Commonwealth Rent Assistance.

Nevertheless, the Council said moving to retirement villages with purpose-built facilities can reduce hospital and GP visits while postponing entry into aged care by up to five years.

“Currently there is a lack of specialist knowledge regarding retirement villages and other aged accommodation, which is causing people to defer decisions, or make the wrong decision about their housing options and the cost of accessing care and support as they age,” the Property Council said.

“It is recommended that the government works with the industry, law societies and consumer organisations to fund and develop an online training course to provide lawyers and financial advisers with the information and training needed to provide specialist advice to seniors wanting to understand the opportunities and costs of rightsizing.”

Elaborating on its recommendation that governments provide “financial certainty to ‘rightsize’”, the Council said senior Australians should “be encouraged to rightsize” and the government should reconsider financial impediments like taxes that “unduly” discourage seniors from making the leap.

The Council explained: “In many cases, the new home or retirement village unit will cost less than the sale price of their family home. These excess sale proceeds are included in the age pension assets test, creating a significant disincentive to rightsizing to a more appropriate home.

“A targeted change to the pension assets test could allow full rate age pensioners, who unlock a modest sum from the sale, to retain their full pension.

“The cost of ‘topping up’ the pension that would otherwise have been lost can partially be recouped when a pensioner moves into a retirement village due to the health, hospital and aged care savings created by retirement village living.”

The Council also suggested state governments consider a “Last Home Owners Grant” program, in which the transaction costs of rightsizing are covered by a cash lump sum or a “deduction of stamp duty payments”.

The government passed elements of its housing affordability plan in December last year, allowing those aged 65 and over who are selling a home which they had owned for at least 10 years to funnel up to $300,000 of the proceeds into their super.

Treasurer Scott Morrison and assistant minister to the Treasurer, Michael Sukkar said in a statement: “The downsizing measure removes a financial obstacle from older Australians who are considering moving to homes that better suit their needs.

“Both members of a couple may take advantage of this measure, together contributing up to $600,000 from the proceeds of the sale into superannuation.

“This will encourage older Australians, where appropriate, to free up homes that no longer meet their needs for younger growing families.”