Invest
Buy a pair, give a pair claim costs $3.5m
Eyewear retailer Oscar Wylee has been ordered by the Federal Court to pay $3.5 million in penalties for misleading or deceptive conduct and making or misleading representations about its charitable donations and affiliations, according to an official statement.
Buy a pair, give a pair claim costs $3.5m
Eyewear retailer Oscar Wylee has been ordered by the Federal Court to pay $3.5 million in penalties for misleading or deceptive conduct and making or misleading representations about its charitable donations and affiliations, according to an official statement.
According to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), between January 2014 and December 2018, Oscar Wylee suggested it would donate a pair of glasses to charity for every purchase.
However, the court heard that in almost five years, Oscar Wylee sold 328,010 pairs of glasses but donated only 3,181 frames to charity, without lenses, which is about one set of frames for each 100 pairs of glasses sold.
“Oscar Wylee promoted its charitable activities as a core reason why consumers should buy Oscar Wylee glasses, but its claims were false and were made in circumstances where consumers could not easily verify these claims for themselves,” ACCC deputy chair Delia Rickard said.
Ms Rickard pointed out that consumers potentially bought glasses from the retailer due to it being socially responsible.
“The misleading conduct also portrayed Oscar Wylee as a socially conscious company that made significant donations of glasses to people in need, which, because this was not true, unfairly differentiated it from other brands in the market.”
“At the same time, Oscar Wylee deprived disadvantaged people in need of the benefits it promised in its advertising,” Ms Rickard said.
The glasses retailer also claimed it had partnered with Rose Charities to help build a sustainable eye care program in Cambodia.
To date, the court heard that the Oscar Wylee association with Rose Charities during the period consisted of a single donation of $2,000 and 100 frames in 2014.
In her judgment, Justice Katzmann said: “Oscar Wylee stood to profit from inducing consumers to purchase its products and still does.
“It built its reputation by engaging in the contravening conduct, appealing to socially conscious consumers who wanted to support charitable causes through their purchasing behaviour. Its conduct was a betrayal of that promise.”
Around 2013, the company also published a promotional video on its website and social media under the “I care for eyecare” slogan, which claimed that “Oscar Wylee helps out through a range of different ways. From the performance of eye tests, distribution of glasses, performance of cataracts surgeries, and training of eye doctors”.
The video showed scenes of poverty in Cambodia, Rose Charities’ eye clinic in Cambodia, and stated, “Every Oscar Wylee glasses purchase will help restore vision in developing regions”.
“Oscar Wylee has taken advantage of the charitable nature and goodwill of consumers and its behaviour risks diminishing consumer confidence to support other businesses that genuinely engage in philanthropic activities,” Ms Rickard said.
“This penalty should serve as a reminder for any company considering making false claims to its customers in its marketing material, whether online, by email, on video, on social media or in store.”
In addition to imposing penalties, the court also ordered Oscar Wylee to publish information online explaining its breaches of the ACL, and pay a contribution to the ACCC’s costs.
Oscar Wylee admitted liability and made joint submissions with the ACCC to the Federal Court consenting to the orders sought.
RELATED ARTICLES
About the author
About the author
Spending
Moneysmart study reveals Gen Z women more concerned about finances than men
A new research conducted by ASIC’s Moneysmart has unveiled the heightened levels of stress and concern regarding finances and the cost of living among Australian Gen Z women compared to their male ...Read more
Spending
The cost of politeness: Aussies out of pocket by $1,350 due to 'awkward tax'
It's the time of year when Australians dive into their pockets for festive events and gatherings, yet a recent study by PayPal suggests that many are too polite, or perhaps too embarrassed, to ask for ...Read more
Spending
Aussies can ‘NAB Now Pay Later’ with the last major bank to embrace BNPL
NAB has become the latest bank to enter the BNPL market. Read more
Spending
Aussie households spent $368 a week on transport after petrol price surge
Fuel costs have increased by 40 per cent over the past year, a new report from the Australian Automobile Association has revealed. Read more
Spending
Voters say reducing the cost of living should be the government’s top priority
Aussies have ranked high cost of living as the top issue that needs to be addressed by the next government. Read more
Spending
Bodies back Labor’s commitment to stronger BNPL regulation
All parties should commit to stronger regulations for the BNPL sector, according to Financial Counselling Australia. Read more
Spending
Household spending surges led by retail and recreation
Spending on retail, recreation and hospitality have continued to climb as COVID-19 case numbers and restrictions have eased. Read more
Spending
Banks extend financial assistance to flood-affected customers
A range of assistance is available from major banks to those impacted by flooding in NSW and Queensland. Read more
Spending
Moneysmart study reveals Gen Z women more concerned about finances than men
A new research conducted by ASIC’s Moneysmart has unveiled the heightened levels of stress and concern regarding finances and the cost of living among Australian Gen Z women compared to their male ...Read more
Spending
The cost of politeness: Aussies out of pocket by $1,350 due to 'awkward tax'
It's the time of year when Australians dive into their pockets for festive events and gatherings, yet a recent study by PayPal suggests that many are too polite, or perhaps too embarrassed, to ask for ...Read more
Spending
Aussies can ‘NAB Now Pay Later’ with the last major bank to embrace BNPL
NAB has become the latest bank to enter the BNPL market. Read more
Spending
Aussie households spent $368 a week on transport after petrol price surge
Fuel costs have increased by 40 per cent over the past year, a new report from the Australian Automobile Association has revealed. Read more
Spending
Voters say reducing the cost of living should be the government’s top priority
Aussies have ranked high cost of living as the top issue that needs to be addressed by the next government. Read more
Spending
Bodies back Labor’s commitment to stronger BNPL regulation
All parties should commit to stronger regulations for the BNPL sector, according to Financial Counselling Australia. Read more
Spending
Household spending surges led by retail and recreation
Spending on retail, recreation and hospitality have continued to climb as COVID-19 case numbers and restrictions have eased. Read more
Spending
Banks extend financial assistance to flood-affected customers
A range of assistance is available from major banks to those impacted by flooding in NSW and Queensland. Read more
