Invest
Property investment strategies: Negative v positive gearing
The term “gearing” refers to borrowing money or taking out a loan to buy an investment asset. This strategy is usually employed by property investors, but the type of gearing they utilise depends on how they want their income and expenses to circulate.
Property investment strategies: Negative v positive gearing
The term “gearing” refers to borrowing money or taking out a loan to buy an investment asset. This strategy is usually employed by property investors, but the type of gearing they utilise depends on how they want their income and expenses to circulate.

Some investors choose to let the property take care of itself through neutral gearing – when rental income is only enough to pay for the overall expense of holding the property. However, many investors choose between positive and negative gearing.
What is positive gearing?
Also known as “cash flow properties”, a positively geared property refers to purchasing an investment property that generates an income that is larger than its overall expenses – including loan interest and principal payments.
Buying a positively geared property is profitable for an investor since they can use the generated income to pay for expenses related to holding the property, as well as accumulate funds from the excess cash to grow their portfolio.
If the property is situated in an area where real estate values are increasing, the property itself may increase in value, and this may generate a capital gain for the investor once they sell the property.

Investors may consistently generate a profit from the rental income; however, the profit they receive must be included as part of their assessable income – and they must pay tax at their effective marginal tax rate.
What is negative gearing?
Negative gearing refers to buying an investment property that generates a larger loss compared to the income derived from it. That is, the total sum of expenses – from maintenance to loan repayments – exceed the income the property generates.
The question now is: if expenses exceed income, why would investors choose to buy a negatively geared property investment? The answer lies in two potential benefits of negative gearing that investors may claim.
Reason #1: Investors may claim a tax loss against their assessable income and this lowers the amount of tax they have to pay when they file their tax return. In some cases, the tax savings can exceed the income loss from the negatively geared property.
Reason #2: If the real estate market where the property is situated rises, so too would the value of their property. If the market delivers strong growth, their property’s capital appreciation may be able to offset the losses incurred while they held the property, and they may generate a large profit once they sell the property.
Negative gearing as an investment strategy
Despite income losses, investors choose to employ negative gearing for their investment strategy as a way to minimise their tax payable annually. However, experts remind investors that it is not advisable to invest in property solely for tax purposes.
Only investors with enough income to cover the losses the property would incur should consider executing a negative gearing strategy.
It may be wiser for an investor to consider how they would meet the expenses should interest rates rise or their main source of income is compromised before investing in a negatively geared property.
About the author

About the author


Property
Twice the demand: the case study behind Melbourne’s first‑home buyer surge
Melbourne has quietly engineered one of Australia’s most consequential housing turnarounds, with first‑home buyer demand running at roughly double the national pace and four of the top five buyer ...Read more

Property
First‑home buyers now anchor Australia’s mortgage growth — but the risk maths is changing
Great Southern Bank’s revelation that nearly one in three of its new mortgages went to first‑home buyers is not an outlier. It is the leading edge of a broader market realignment powered by government ...Read more

Property
Home guarantee scheme shake-up challenges Australia’s housing market players
From 1 October 2025, the expanded Home Guarantee Scheme (HGS) materially widens what first-home buyers can purchase and where. By sharply lifting price caps and relaxing eligibility settings, the ...Read more

Property
GSB’s first‑home buyer play: turning policy tailwinds into market share
Great Southern Bank’s latest results show that nearly one in three of its new mortgages now go to first‑home buyers—evidence of a fast‑moving market reshaped by government guarantees, easing rates and ...Read more

Property
Why investors are fleeing and renters are scrambling in Australia's housing maze
Australia’s rental market is tightening even as individual landlords sell down. New data points to a multi‑year investor retreat tied to higher holding costs and regulatory uncertainty, while prices ...Read more

Property
Australia's 5% deposit guarantee: Unlocking gains while balancing risks in the market share race
Can a bigger government guarantee fix housing access without fuelling prices? Australia is about to find out. The Albanese government’s expanded 5% deposit pathway aims to help 70,000 buyers, remove ...Read more

Property
Australia's bold move the 5% deposit scheme shaking up the housing market
Can a government guarantee replace lenders mortgage insurance without inflating prices or risk? Canberra’s accelerated 5% deposit scheme is a bold demand-side nudge in a supply‑constrained marketRead more

Property
When rates drop but stress sticks: exploring Australia's mortgage arrears dilemma
Headline numbers suggest arrears ease as rates come down. The reality in Australia is messier: broad measures dipped into mid‑2025, yet severe delinquencies and non‑bank portfolios remain under ...Read more

Property
Twice the demand: the case study behind Melbourne’s first‑home buyer surge
Melbourne has quietly engineered one of Australia’s most consequential housing turnarounds, with first‑home buyer demand running at roughly double the national pace and four of the top five buyer ...Read more

Property
First‑home buyers now anchor Australia’s mortgage growth — but the risk maths is changing
Great Southern Bank’s revelation that nearly one in three of its new mortgages went to first‑home buyers is not an outlier. It is the leading edge of a broader market realignment powered by government ...Read more

Property
Home guarantee scheme shake-up challenges Australia’s housing market players
From 1 October 2025, the expanded Home Guarantee Scheme (HGS) materially widens what first-home buyers can purchase and where. By sharply lifting price caps and relaxing eligibility settings, the ...Read more

Property
GSB’s first‑home buyer play: turning policy tailwinds into market share
Great Southern Bank’s latest results show that nearly one in three of its new mortgages now go to first‑home buyers—evidence of a fast‑moving market reshaped by government guarantees, easing rates and ...Read more

Property
Why investors are fleeing and renters are scrambling in Australia's housing maze
Australia’s rental market is tightening even as individual landlords sell down. New data points to a multi‑year investor retreat tied to higher holding costs and regulatory uncertainty, while prices ...Read more

Property
Australia's 5% deposit guarantee: Unlocking gains while balancing risks in the market share race
Can a bigger government guarantee fix housing access without fuelling prices? Australia is about to find out. The Albanese government’s expanded 5% deposit pathway aims to help 70,000 buyers, remove ...Read more

Property
Australia's bold move the 5% deposit scheme shaking up the housing market
Can a government guarantee replace lenders mortgage insurance without inflating prices or risk? Canberra’s accelerated 5% deposit scheme is a bold demand-side nudge in a supply‑constrained marketRead more

Property
When rates drop but stress sticks: exploring Australia's mortgage arrears dilemma
Headline numbers suggest arrears ease as rates come down. The reality in Australia is messier: broad measures dipped into mid‑2025, yet severe delinquencies and non‑bank portfolios remain under ...Read more