Borrow
Westpac blames poor judgement for money laundering breaches
Poor individual judgement has been cited as one of the reasons Westpac was alleged to have made 23 million breaches of Australia’s anti-money laundering laws.
Westpac blames poor judgement for money laundering breaches
Poor individual judgement has been cited as one of the reasons Westpac was alleged to have made 23 million breaches of Australia’s anti-money laundering laws.
The bank has now released the findings from its own investigation into its compliance with the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (AML/CTF Act).
In November last year, the Australian anti-terrorism regulator filed a civil penalty order against the big four bank, alleging systemic non-compliance with the AML/CTF Act, which even saw it failing to detect known child exploitation risks.
The company board had made a commitment to make the review’s results public at its 2019 annual general meeting, with the latest update from the bank revealing a concession from Westpac that it had failed to properly adhere to AUSTRAC guidance for child exploitation risk.
This was due to deficient financial crime processes, compounded by poor individual judgements, the bank’s statement read.
In its review, Westpac identified three primary causes of the AML/CTF compliance failures:
- Some areas of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing risk were not sufficiently understood within Westpac;
- There were unclear end-to-end accountabilities for managing AML/CTF compliance; and
- There was a lack of sufficient AML/CTF expertise and resourcing.
Weighing in on the findings, chairman John McFarlane said it had been his experience since joining the bank “that Westpac deeply regrets this matter”.
“Indeed, recognising the seriousness of the issues raised by AUSTRAC, the former CEO stepped down and the former chairman brought forward his retirement,” he added.
“We are all committed to fixing these issues so they don’t happen again.”
The report noted that with the benefit of hindsight, and the board’s escalation of focus on AML/CTF compliance, “directors could have recognised earlier the systemic nature of some of the financial crime issues Westpac was facing”.
According to Westpac CEO Peter King, the review looked back more than 10 years, with “appropriate” action already having been taken where wrongdoing occurred.
“Remuneration and disciplinary actions took into consideration decisions already taken and announced, the level of direct managerial responsibility or accountability for the compliance failures, and the level of culpability for failings,” he outlined.
“While the compliance failures were serious, the problems were faults of omission.”
The CEO observed “there was no evidence of intentional wrongdoing”.
Mr King’s comments come after the bank recently conceded it would likely be forced to cough up $900 million for the civil claim.
This was detailed in an announcement to shareholders that detailed a billion-dollar hit to cash earnings in 1H20.
In light of the report, and in acceptance of the review’s recommendations, Mr King recognises a need for change to take place:
“We have established a new Board Legal, Regulatory & Compliance sub-committee, appointed a deeply experienced executive to a new Executive position directly responsible for financial crime compliance, and made a number of other organisational changes,” he stated.
“We will have no tolerance for controllable negative events. Our transformation program has begun and will bring deep cultural change.”
“We completely accept that some important aspects of Westpac’s financial crime risk culture were immature and reactive, and we failed to build sufficient capacity and experience in some important areas,” Mr King added.
“We have learned from this and are absolutely committed to making amends for this event.”
Westpac has revealed it would continue to engage with AUSTRAC on the legal proceedings, after submitting its civil penalty defence and admissions on 15 May 2020.
Did you enjoy this article? You may also be interested in:
About the author
About the author
Banking
Banks to extend COVID-19 loan deferrals beyond ‘September cliff’
Australia’s banks will now extend loan deferrals for another four months for customers who have been impacted by COVID-19 pandemic, as creditors try to avoid the September cliff. ...Read more
Banking
Got a problem with your financial service provider? It’s worth complaining
More than 80,000 complaints have been filed with the Australian Financial Complaints Authority in the past 12 months alone, which has led to the recuperation of more than $250 million in compensation ...Read more
Banking
The Consumer Data Right is now live: What does this mean?
With the permission of a customer, banks are now be able to share consumer data with other banks, thanks to the Consumer Data Right system. So, how will this system actually benefit Australians? ...Read more
Banking
Shelter from the storm: Australians find sanctuary with big 4
Australian borrowers appear to have flocked back to big four banks in droves since the COVID-19 crisis began – but why? ...Read more
Banking
Junk insurance class actions claim another bank
Another major bank is in the junk insurance firing line, with the filing of yet another class action on the matter in the Federal Court. ...Read more
Banking
CBA to cough up $5 million for customer failings
The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has admitted that it failed more than 8,ooo customers using the AgriAdvantage Plus Package on more than 130,000 occasions in a new court judgement. ...Read more
Banking
ANZ still working to ‘simplify its business’
ANZ has agreed to part with its New Zealand-based asset finance business, in alignment with its aim for a more streamlined bank offering. ...Read more
Banking
Outlook turns negative for mutual banks
An investor service has revised its outlook for mutual banks to negative, as the economic fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic continues. ...Read more
Banking
Banks to extend COVID-19 loan deferrals beyond ‘September cliff’
Australia’s banks will now extend loan deferrals for another four months for customers who have been impacted by COVID-19 pandemic, as creditors try to avoid the September cliff. ...Read more
Banking
Got a problem with your financial service provider? It’s worth complaining
More than 80,000 complaints have been filed with the Australian Financial Complaints Authority in the past 12 months alone, which has led to the recuperation of more than $250 million in compensation ...Read more
Banking
The Consumer Data Right is now live: What does this mean?
With the permission of a customer, banks are now be able to share consumer data with other banks, thanks to the Consumer Data Right system. So, how will this system actually benefit Australians? ...Read more
Banking
Shelter from the storm: Australians find sanctuary with big 4
Australian borrowers appear to have flocked back to big four banks in droves since the COVID-19 crisis began – but why? ...Read more
Banking
Junk insurance class actions claim another bank
Another major bank is in the junk insurance firing line, with the filing of yet another class action on the matter in the Federal Court. ...Read more
Banking
CBA to cough up $5 million for customer failings
The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has admitted that it failed more than 8,ooo customers using the AgriAdvantage Plus Package on more than 130,000 occasions in a new court judgement. ...Read more
Banking
ANZ still working to ‘simplify its business’
ANZ has agreed to part with its New Zealand-based asset finance business, in alignment with its aim for a more streamlined bank offering. ...Read more
Banking
Outlook turns negative for mutual banks
An investor service has revised its outlook for mutual banks to negative, as the economic fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic continues. ...Read more
More articles
Website Notifications
Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.