Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by momentummedia
nestegg logo

Retirement

Ouch: Super insurance fees could surge 26 per cent

  • June 26 2018
  • Share

Retirement

Ouch: Super insurance fees could surge 26 per cent

By Lucy Dean
June 26 2018

Touted as a way to protect against balance erosion, an opt-in approach to insurance in super could instead see insurance premiums rise 26 per cent, new modelling suggests.

Ouch: Super insurance fees could surge 26 per cent

author image
  • June 26 2018
  • Share

Touted as a way to protect against balance erosion, an opt-in approach to insurance in super could instead see insurance premiums rise 26 per cent, new modelling suggests.

Surge, arrow up

According to modelling by big four accounting firm KPMG, the shift to make insurance in super an opt-in question for those younger than 25, those with inactive accounts and those with balances of less than $6,000 could see other savers stung with a potential premium hike of 26 per cent.

KPMG said the proposal, outlined in the 2018-19 budget, would see a 50 per cent fall in the levels of group life insurance cover and a 42 per cent fall in insurance premiums collections. The firm said this would have an “adverse impact” on premiums, with the shortfall prompting a hike in premiums.

Noting that the outcome at retirement is subject to future changes, KPMG said there were two potential outcomes. The first, in which premiums aren’t increased, would see fee-led balance erosion fall from 6.2 per cent to 5.8 per cent.

Advertisement
Advertisement

However, if premiums were to increase by the anticipated 26 per cent, the average erosion would rise to 7.3 per cent.

Surge, arrow up

“The most heavily impacted categories of erosion of benefits due to default insurance cover are females and low income earners,” KPMG warned.

“For example, considering an increase in insurance premiums of 26 per cent, we estimate the average erosion of account balances for females will increase from 7.6 per cent to 9.0 per cent and low income earners (<$18,200) to increase from 15.8 per cent to 17.6 per cent.”

The firm said the changes would have both intended and unintended “material impacts”, and would leave women and low income earners “worse off”.

Forward this article to a friend. Follow us on Linkedin. Join us on Facebook. Find us on X for the latest updates
Rate the article

more on this topic

more on this topic

More articles