Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.

The $1.6m question

big question mark

A $1.6 million nest egg may seem like a pipe-dream to many, but according to HLB Mann Judd, timing and dedication can make all the difference.  

In an era of ongoing tinkering with the superannuation system, rising housing challenges and an increasingly casualised workforce, the idea of accruing $1.6 million in superannuation could lead many Australians to echo Dale Kerrigan and say: “Tell ‘em they’re dreaming.”

However, HLB Mann Judd wealth partner Jonathan Philpot argues it can be done provided savers start early and maximise their concessional contributions.

Noting that many 40-year-olds have $100,000 in super thanks to mandatory super payments their entire working lives, Mr Philpot said they could reach $1.6 million, or close to it, if they began maximising their super now.


However, they would need to be putting in close to $25,000 a year to do it.

That doesn’t mean older savers are without hope, he continued, urging savers to consult with a financial adviser five years out from retirement.

“As a minimum, a five-year retirement strategy focused on building superannuation will provide a few years to maximise the concessional super contributions, Mr Philpot said.

“If you are in a position to also take advantage of the non-concessional contributions, in particular the three-year bring forward rule, careful planning is needed around the age in which the contributions will be made, to maximise the total amount that goes into super.”

‘There’d be hardly any 35-year-olds who’d be willing to put $25,000 into super’

Wealth management partner Michael Hutton acknowledged that younger savers are unlikely to choose to maximise their super over saving for a house, or paying off a mortgage.

“There’s a lot more changes happening much more rapidly, there’s no question,” Mr Hutton said on the changing employment landscape.

Younger Australians may not even enjoy the same retirement tax structures, Mr Philpot added.

“It probably won't be a tax-free retirement and all that, but you've just got to operate with the rules you've currently got in place,” he said.

“It [super maximisation] is not for everybody,” Mr Philpot said, pointing to the financial realities of sizeable mortgages.

“Focusing on that kind of thing is fine as well. It's really just an option to discuss and look at other strategies.”

The $1.6m question
big question mark
nestegg logo
subscribe to our newsletter sign up
Recommended by Spike Native Network
Anonymous - This is silly. Most countries would think 3 per cent was fantastically low. Further, who measures how much economic activity is being destroyed by.......
Anonymous - What a load of rot! What is he comparing the detriment to, and how much does the GFC effects factor into his farcical calculations? ....
Anonymous - In other words, sack advisers and cut costs. It's the financial version of #me too movement.....
Anonymous - If that's after tax pay then I'm screwed.....