Save
Don’t get creative: Quirky defences in court a lesson for taxpayers
In recent months, Australian courts have heard creative excuses from taxpayers in trouble with the law, and it hasn’t done them any favours in getting out of penalties.
Don’t get creative: Quirky defences in court a lesson for taxpayers
In recent months, Australian courts have heard creative excuses from taxpayers in trouble with the law, and it hasn’t done them any favours in getting out of penalties.

Recently, the NSW Supreme Court has ordered John Lamont to pay $4.3 million to the Tax Office, comprising of primary tax, the Medicare levy, administrative penalties for tax shortfall, shortfall interest charge, penalty for a non-lodgement of a return, and general interest charge. The debts arose during the financial years of 2002 to 2013.
Mr Lamont, who was self-represented in the proceedings at all times, provided a five-page written submission to the court, which included biblical references in support of a proposition that the income tax legislation of the Commonwealth of Australia was ineffective because the relevant acts did not “refer to or define a man or a woman and hence, parliament did not pass statutes that apply to a man nor a woman”.
The submission also cited a 1796 decision of the Supreme Court of North Carolina to support an argument that the defendant is not bound by any laws or institutions except those to which he gives his consent.
“I no longer consent to the statutes in par 7 above apply to me, the living man,” Mr Lamont’s submission wrote.
Mr Lamont’s submission also included statements that he did not consent to “doing business with the plaintiff” or with the plaintiff’s legal representative and did not “consent to these proceedings”.
Justice Des Fagan said the defence was “frivolous and insubstantial” and dismissed them from consideration, ordering Mr Lamont to repay the tax debts and the ATO’s costs of the proceedings.
“In any event, the submissions are incoherent and I have been unable to divine from them anything meaningful,” said Justice Fagan in his judgment.
Further, earlier this month, a taxpayer from North Bendigo told the Bendigo Magistrates Court that he rejected having to lodge an income tax return because he was “a human being who waives my right to recognition as a person”.
Instead, magistrate Michael King found the man guilty of all six charges, noting that paying tax did not contravene human rights, and rubbishing Mr Polglaise’s arguments as “entirely lacking in merit”. He was fined $6,000 and ordered to lodge his outstanding tax returns.
“That would make a mockery of the law,” said Dr King. “This was persistent and blatant disregard of income tax law.”
You can find out more about what is on the Tax Office’s radar this year here.


Tax saving
Navigating tax laws for capital gains in 2023
The landscape of Australian tax laws surrounding capital gains is ever-changing, with 2023 being no exception. Read more

Tax saving
What you need to know about the tax implications of crypto
One million Aussies are now invested in crypto, but many have not thought about how these investments will affect them at tax time. Read more

Tax saving
Welfare overhaul could give recipients a leg-up
Australia’s Centrelink recipients who’ve been doing it tough are in for a potentially easier time if the federal government pursues ambitious reforms that could provide sturdier safety nets. Read more

Tax saving
Students should think twice before tapping into their super
Former students might want to think carefully before they look to take advantage of the federal government’s biggest first home buyer incentive. Read more

Tax saving
Advocates call for an end to tax cuts
Social services sector advocates have warned that further tax cuts may make solving Australia’s biggest challenges much harder. Read more

Tax saving
ATO and AUSTRAC may gain new phone-tapping powers
A proposed update to electronic surveillance legislation could see the ATO armed with new powers that would allow the agency to bug phones and intercept online communications. Read more

Tax saving
Over 2m Aussies asked the TPB for help during the last year
As the economy recovers, Australia’s tax regulator says it’s planning to put unregistered practitioners under the microscope. Read more

Tax saving
Will you pay higher taxes due to bracket creep?
Bracket creep will see Australians paying more tax on average, unless further cuts are introduced in the future. Read more

Tax saving
Navigating tax laws for capital gains in 2023
The landscape of Australian tax laws surrounding capital gains is ever-changing, with 2023 being no exception. Read more

Tax saving
What you need to know about the tax implications of crypto
One million Aussies are now invested in crypto, but many have not thought about how these investments will affect them at tax time. Read more

Tax saving
Welfare overhaul could give recipients a leg-up
Australia’s Centrelink recipients who’ve been doing it tough are in for a potentially easier time if the federal government pursues ambitious reforms that could provide sturdier safety nets. Read more

Tax saving
Students should think twice before tapping into their super
Former students might want to think carefully before they look to take advantage of the federal government’s biggest first home buyer incentive. Read more

Tax saving
Advocates call for an end to tax cuts
Social services sector advocates have warned that further tax cuts may make solving Australia’s biggest challenges much harder. Read more

Tax saving
ATO and AUSTRAC may gain new phone-tapping powers
A proposed update to electronic surveillance legislation could see the ATO armed with new powers that would allow the agency to bug phones and intercept online communications. Read more

Tax saving
Over 2m Aussies asked the TPB for help during the last year
As the economy recovers, Australia’s tax regulator says it’s planning to put unregistered practitioners under the microscope. Read more

Tax saving
Will you pay higher taxes due to bracket creep?
Bracket creep will see Australians paying more tax on average, unless further cuts are introduced in the future. Read more