Save
Just a ‘myth’: will dividend reform see investors double-taxed?
Two prominent politicians have locked horns over whether changes to dividend imputation policy would see investors taxed twice, with one Labor senator labelling concerns a “myth”.
Just a ‘myth’: will dividend reform see investors double-taxed?
Two prominent politicians have locked horns over whether changes to dividend imputation policy would see investors taxed twice, with one Labor senator labelling concerns a “myth”.
Labor senator for NSW Kristina Keneally has hit back at arguments against Labor’s proposed changes to dividend imputation credit arrangements, claiming the argument that the proposal will see some investors taxed twice is a “myth”.
Speaking at a Financial Services Council event on Wednesday, the politician said the argument that investors would suffer double taxation as a result of the denied cash refunds was “frankly … an absurd argument”.
“Labor introduced dividend imputation in 1987 because taxing income in the form of dividends was clearly double taxation, but people who don’t pay income tax are not taxed on their dividends either, and so refundability essentially means that no tax is paid on corporate profits in question,” she said.
“Let’s take this a step further. Imagine for a second a theoretical world in which every share in Australia is held by someone who paid no income tax. The company pays tax at the prevailing corporate rate, the company distributes dividends to its shareholders, who are all entitled to a tax refund for the franking credits, and the cash refund is paid to the shareholder.”
In this situation, the entire tax paid by the company is refunded to its shareholders – so effectively, the company has avoided taxation altogether, Ms Keneally said.
“Dividend imputation reform is a continuation of our willingness to make the tough decisions on budget repair, and seek a mandate to implement them.”
Minister for Revenue and Financial Services Kelly O’Dwyer, it’s fair to say, doesn’t share this view.
During a speech given to a Fairfax wealth summit on Wednesday, the minister referred to the proposed policy as double taxation on three separate instances.
Agreeing with Ms Keneally that the original 1987 policy was introduced to protect shareholders from double taxation, she argued that the Howard government’s amendments to the policy in 2000, which allowed those with low or zero taxable incomes to receive a cash refund instead of a tax-offsetting credit, were the final step in fully protecting investors from double taxation.
“People receiving dividend imputation credits could now use these credits to offset other forms of income, while people on lower taxable incomes received their tax credit back in the form of a tax refund – remembering that as shareholders they already paid company tax,” she said.
So, what is it?
The original 1987 legislation branded itself as the “biggest tax cut in Australian history”.
In a media statement, then-treasurer Paul Keating said, “Shareholders will not have to pay tax on dividends if the company has already paid tax on the profits. Instead, they will get an 'imputation credit' for the tax paid by the company.
“This means that shareholders on lower marginal tax rates will even get a net credit on their tax bill.”
According to the Australian Taxation Office, the general idea behind imputation and franking is to prevent double taxation, “that is, the taxation of profits when earned by a corporate tax entity, and again when a recipient receives a distribution”.
In a discussion paper released in 2015, the ATO characterised the 1987 policy as relieving double taxation, with the reformed system a means of making imputation credits “refundable for some taxpayers”.
It continued: “Refundability ensures that the final tax on company profits reflects each shareholder’s tax rate at the time that the profits are distributed. Arguably, this provides for greater neutrality between different types of investments and removes a penalty that would otherwise apply to shareholders who have a lower tax rate (for example, retiree shareholders on relatively low incomes).
“However, as noted above, domestic shareholders may receive higher returns on domestic shares compared to global rates of returns on equities, because of imputation. There are some revenue concerns with the refundability of imputation credits.”
These include the greater incentive for shareholders of closely-held companies to delay their distributions until they have a lower tax rate, in order to receive the refund of tax paid by the corporation.
RELATED ARTICLES
Tax saving
Navigating tax laws for capital gains in 2023
The landscape of Australian tax laws surrounding capital gains is ever-changing, with 2023 being no exception. Read more
Tax saving
What you need to know about the tax implications of crypto
One million Aussies are now invested in crypto, but many have not thought about how these investments will affect them at tax time. Read more
Tax saving
Welfare overhaul could give recipients a leg-up
Australia’s Centrelink recipients who’ve been doing it tough are in for a potentially easier time if the federal government pursues ambitious reforms that could provide sturdier safety nets. Read more
Tax saving
Students should think twice before tapping into their super
Former students might want to think carefully before they look to take advantage of the federal government’s biggest first home buyer incentive. Read more
Tax saving
Advocates call for an end to tax cuts
Social services sector advocates have warned that further tax cuts may make solving Australia’s biggest challenges much harder. Read more
Tax saving
ATO and AUSTRAC may gain new phone-tapping powers
A proposed update to electronic surveillance legislation could see the ATO armed with new powers that would allow the agency to bug phones and intercept online communications. Read more
Tax saving
Over 2m Aussies asked the TPB for help during the last year
As the economy recovers, Australia’s tax regulator says it’s planning to put unregistered practitioners under the microscope. Read more
Tax saving
Will you pay higher taxes due to bracket creep?
Bracket creep will see Australians paying more tax on average, unless further cuts are introduced in the future. Read more
Tax saving
Navigating tax laws for capital gains in 2023
The landscape of Australian tax laws surrounding capital gains is ever-changing, with 2023 being no exception. Read more
Tax saving
What you need to know about the tax implications of crypto
One million Aussies are now invested in crypto, but many have not thought about how these investments will affect them at tax time. Read more
Tax saving
Welfare overhaul could give recipients a leg-up
Australia’s Centrelink recipients who’ve been doing it tough are in for a potentially easier time if the federal government pursues ambitious reforms that could provide sturdier safety nets. Read more
Tax saving
Students should think twice before tapping into their super
Former students might want to think carefully before they look to take advantage of the federal government’s biggest first home buyer incentive. Read more
Tax saving
Advocates call for an end to tax cuts
Social services sector advocates have warned that further tax cuts may make solving Australia’s biggest challenges much harder. Read more
Tax saving
ATO and AUSTRAC may gain new phone-tapping powers
A proposed update to electronic surveillance legislation could see the ATO armed with new powers that would allow the agency to bug phones and intercept online communications. Read more
Tax saving
Over 2m Aussies asked the TPB for help during the last year
As the economy recovers, Australia’s tax regulator says it’s planning to put unregistered practitioners under the microscope. Read more
Tax saving
Will you pay higher taxes due to bracket creep?
Bracket creep will see Australians paying more tax on average, unless further cuts are introduced in the future. Read more
More articles
OUR PLATFORMS AND BRANDS
- Accountants Daily
- Accounting Times
- Adviser Innovation
- Australian Aviation
- Broker Daily
- Cyber Daily
- Defence Connect
- Fintech Business
- HR Leader
- Independent Financial Adviser
- Investment Centre
- Investor Daily
- Lawyers Weekly
- Money Management
- Nestegg
- Property Buzz
- Real Estate Business
- Smart Property Investment
- SMSF Adviser
- Space Connect
- Super Review
- The Adviser
- Wellness Daily
- World of Aviation
EVENTS AND SUMMITS
- ACE25 The Accounting Conference and Exhibition
- Adviser Innovation Summit
- Australian Accounting Awards
- Australian AI Awards
- Australian Aviation Awards
- Australian Aviation Summit
- Australian Broking Awards
- Australian Cyber Awards
- Australian Cyber Summit
- Australian Defence Industry Awards
- Australian Law Awards
- Australian Law Forum
- Australian Space Awards
- Australian Space Summit
- Australian Wealth Management Awards
- Australian Wealth Management Summit
- Better Business Awards
- Better Business Summit
- Broker Innovation Awards
- Broker Innovation Summit
- Budget Summit
- Commerical Finance Awards
- Corporate Counsel Summit
- Defence & National Security Workforce Awards
- Fund Manager of the Year Awards
- ifa Excellence Awards
- Lawyers Weekly 30 Under 30 Awards
- New Broker Academy
- Partner of the Year Awards
- Partner Summit
- REB Awards
- Rising Star Awards
- SME Bootcamp
- SMSF Technical Strategy Day
- Super Fund of the Year Awards
- Women in Finance Awards
- Women in Finance Summit
- Women in Law Awards
- Women in Law Forum
LEARNING AND EDUCATION
MOMENTUM MARKETS NETWORK
LINKS
STAY CONNECTED
Make your nest egg grow. Register now for nestegg updates.