Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by momentummedia
nestegg logo

Retirement

Why Insurance in super is ill-suited for mental health conditions

  • August 07 2020
  • Share

Retirement

Why Insurance in super is ill-suited for mental health conditions

By Cameron Micallef
August 07 2020

Members with a mental health condition might not be getting bang for their buck through their total and permanent disability insurance, new research has found.

Why Insurance in super is ill-suited for mental health conditions

author image
  • August 07 2020
  • Share

Research released by Super Consumers in early July found that 30 of the 32 insurance policies (94 per cent) from Australia’s biggest superannuation funds contain restrictive definitions of TPD that apply the ‘activities of daily living’ ADL (or similar) test on the basis of work status.

Corporate regulator ASIC has found that claims assessed using an ADL test are 5 times more likely to be rejected. It also found that 77 per cent of mental health claims were rejected when an ADL test applied, compared with 15 per cent when the standard test applied. 

To successfully claim on a policy that uses an ADL test, a person must show they can't do two basic physical activities such as speaking, walking, eating, dressing or using the bathroom.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“The practical impact is people with a mental health condition can’t claim on this insurance when they need it most. It’s clear these terms disadvantage people with mental health claims and are designed to protect insurer profits”, says Super Consumers Australia director Xavier O’Halloran. 

why insurance in super is ill suited for mental health conditions

Public Interest Advocacy Centre noted it has concerns that the insurance discriminates against people with a mental health condition.

"Excluding people from protection because they have a mental health condition is unacceptable,” senior solicitor Ellen Tilbury noted.

“We've seen insurers do it before by imposing overly broad mental health exclusions. The use of ADLs is another attempt to deny adequate cover to people with a mental health condition," Ms Tilbury says.

Clinical neuropsychologist Dr Jane Lonie says ADLs are “totally inappropriate” for measuring the occupational function of people with mental health conditions or injuries causing cognitive impairment.

 "I am very concerned about the practice of using ADL tests to measure whether people with these conditions can hold down a job," says Dr Lonie.

The Financial Services Council has agreed to temporarily waive discriminatory terms until 1 January 2021 due to the global pandemic. Super Consumers maintain that ADLs should be ruled out for good. 

“Insurers and funds have a duty to act in members’ best interests and to ensure that their services are fit for purpose. Making people pay full price for insurance they can’t claim on doesn’t meet that purpose, these terms should be removed altogether,” Mr O’Halloran concluded.

Forward this article to a friend. Follow us on Linkedin. Join us on Facebook. Find us on X for the latest updates
Rate the article

About the author

author image

Cameron is a journalist for Momentum Media's nestegg and Smart Property Investment. He enjoys giving Aussies practical financial tips and tricks to help grow their wealth and achieve financial independence. As a self-confessed finance nerd, Cameron enjoys chatting with industry experts and commentators to leverage their insights to grow your portfolio.

About the author

author image
Cameron Micallef

Cameron is a journalist for Momentum Media's nestegg and Smart Property Investment. He enjoys giving Aussies practical financial tips and tricks to help grow their wealth and achieve financial independence. As a self-confessed finance nerd, Cameron enjoys chatting with industry experts and commentators to leverage their insights to grow your portfolio.

more on this topic

more on this topic

More articles