Powered by momentummedia
nestegg logo
Powered by momentummedia
nestegg logo
nestegg logo

Retirement

Setting up an SMSF is too easy: REI Super

By Lucy Dean · June 12 2018
Reading:
egg
egg
egg
Setting up an SMSF is too easy: REI Super

Setting up an SMSF is too easy: REI Super

author image
By Lucy Dean · June 12 2018
Reading:
egg
egg
egg

There are too many low-balance SMSFs losing out on fees, a super fund has said, calling for higher barriers to entry for SMSF trustees.

Pointing to the Productivity Commission’s recent findings that low-balance SMSFs perform “significantly worse” than APRA-regulated super funds, the real estate industry super fund, REI Super, said it’s too easy for Australians to set up SMSFs and naïve investors are paying the price.

REI Super CEO Mal Smith noted that one in five SMSFs have balances of $200,000 or less, and said this ATO figure represents a “significant proportion” of the industry subjected to “considerable risk”.

Coupled with the Productivity Commission’s findings that smaller SMSFs tend to deliver “materially lower returns” due to higher costs, he argued that SMSFs aren’t worth an investor’s time unless they have at least $2 million in their balance.

Mr Smith said he’s seen instances of REI Super members leaving to set up an SMSF before returning after being stung by low returns and “hidden fees”.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“One member with an account balance of $100,000 was advised to go into an SMSF by her accountant, he said.

“Another member was given bad advice and set up an SMSF with her husband with a combined account balance of $300,000.”

Data shared by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) with the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry revealed that nine in 10 SMSF professionals failed to meet best interest requirements. This meant clients “risked being significantly worse off”.

Deputy chair Peter Kell noted that clients could be compromised by this, and acknowledged that one-size-fits-all advice poses an issue.

Mr Smith said returned members cited the difficulty, the time consumption and required expertise as key triggers to ditch their SMSF set-up.

He concluded, “Changes to SMSF rules would help prevent financial advisers from encouraging people into an SMSF when it is not in their best interest.”

Forward this article to a friend. Follow us on Linkedin. Join us on Facebook. Find us on Twitter for the latest updates
Rate the article
author image

About the author

Join The Nest Egg community

We Translate Complicated Financial Jargon Into Easy-To-Understand Information For Australians

Your email address will be shared with nestegg and subject to our Privacy Policy

From the web

Recommended by Spike Native Network

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.

Copyright © 2019 MOMENTUM MEDIA