Retirement
Expanding super top-up cap will compound gender gap: report
Increasing the limits on voluntary super contributions was pitched as a way for low-income earners to boost their savings, but the move could potentially backfire, a new report warns.
Expanding super top-up cap will compound gender gap: report
Increasing the limits on voluntary super contributions was pitched as a way for low-income earners to boost their savings, but the move could potentially backfire, a new report warns.
Grattan Institute fellow Brendan Coates has today (9 February) warned that Australia’s super system is failing Australia’s poorest, who are “disproportionately women”.
Labelling the retirement savings gender gap a persistent problem, he argued that the push to increase the caps on super contributions would “likely worsen gender inequality in retirement savings”.
“Women save less via superannuation because they earn less. The current generous annual caps on pre-tax contributions are predominately used by older, high-income men to reduce their tax bills,” he said.
Mr Coates conceded that there are other proposals, like the Low Income Superannuation Tax Offset, which are more targeted at the gender gap. He said these proposals aim to provide more top-up opportunities for low-income earners and will ensure that these earners don’t face disadvantage when making super contributions.
Nevertheless, the super top-up cap should not be increased, he emphasised arguing that tailoring the caps to those most in need is too complex, and that super fees will also erode the value of the increased caps.
“For example, Industry Super Australia’s proposed $5,000 Super Seed annual contribution to the superannuation accounts of younger low-income earners could cost almost $4 billion a year – and about a quarter of the Super Seed payments would still go to Australia’s wealthiest 50 per cent of households,” he said.
Boosting the super guarantee isn’t the solution either
Mr Coates said increasing super contributions is linked with lower wages and ultimately lower living standards.
“Therefore, increasing the super guarantee to 12 per cent will hurt the living standards of low-income earners, the bulk of whom are women.
“And raising the super guarantee to 12 per cent could also hurt the retirement incomes of existing pensioners, by suppressing wages indexation of the age pension.”
What does Mr Coates suggest?
The Grattan fellow proposed targeted super tax breaks, as current super tax breaks disproportionately boost high-income earners and not the people who need them most.
“Better targeting of super tax breaks could free-up revenue to provide more targeted support for retirement incomes for people who need it most, and to reduce marginal effective tax rates for low- and middle-income earners to encourage greater female workforce participation,” he expanded.
His second proposal is to boost the age pension for retirees who don’t own their own home, as part of a higher Commonwealth Rent Assistance.
He argued that this would be the most effective tool in alleviating retirement poverty.
“Single women who are retired and do not own their own home are the group most likely to rely almost solely on the age pension, and are at the greatest risk of poverty in retirement.
“This proposal is affordable: a targeted $500-a-year boost to Rent Assistance for age pensioners would cost $250 million a year.”
Addressing the gender gap in superannuation is a difficult area. Let us know what you think of this proposal in the comments.
Superannuation
How did your super fund perform in 2020?
Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, superannuation funds have delivered a positive return for members over the 2020 calendar year, new research has revealed. ...Read more
Superannuation
Senator slams super funds: ‘People are smarter than super funds think’
Senator Andrew Bragg has hit out at superannuation funds after they stood up in opposition to the government’s alleged plan to ask workers to choose between putting money in their super or having m...Read more
Superannuation
Why opt-in super proposal is a ‘secret tax’ on Aussie workers
A proposal to give workers the option to pick between a wage rise or a super contribution increase has been slammed by industry funds, branding it as “a secret tax” on workers. ...Read more
Superannuation
Early super access could be less than expected
Money accessed through the early release of super scheme looked to be coming in under the government’s revised expectations as the scheme drew to a close at the end of 2020. ...Read more
Superannuation
Proposed super reforms to rob millions of Australians
Australia’s largest union has rejected the government’s new super reforms on the basis it will leave members worse off long-term due to being “stapled” to a high-fee fund. ...Read more
Superannuation
ISA takes another shot at super reforms, accuses government of favouring big banks
Just a few days after hitting out at the government’s Your Future, Your Super scheme, ISA is at it again, signalling to the government that it may have a fight on its hands when it comes to this now...Read more
Superannuation
Royal commission reforms pass Parliament signaling more super oversight
The first bill implementing recommendations from Hayne’s banking royal commission has passed through the Parliament. ...Read more
Superannuation
Fears half of super system may be exempt from performance test
While the Your Future, Your Super measure has been a topic of debate for weeks over its ability to create possibly unintended consequences, new questions have emerged about the measure’s ability to ...Read more
Superannuation
How did your super fund perform in 2020?
Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, superannuation funds have delivered a positive return for members over the 2020 calendar year, new research has revealed. ...Read more
Superannuation
Senator slams super funds: ‘People are smarter than super funds think’
Senator Andrew Bragg has hit out at superannuation funds after they stood up in opposition to the government’s alleged plan to ask workers to choose between putting money in their super or having m...Read more
Superannuation
Why opt-in super proposal is a ‘secret tax’ on Aussie workers
A proposal to give workers the option to pick between a wage rise or a super contribution increase has been slammed by industry funds, branding it as “a secret tax” on workers. ...Read more
Superannuation
Early super access could be less than expected
Money accessed through the early release of super scheme looked to be coming in under the government’s revised expectations as the scheme drew to a close at the end of 2020. ...Read more
Superannuation
Proposed super reforms to rob millions of Australians
Australia’s largest union has rejected the government’s new super reforms on the basis it will leave members worse off long-term due to being “stapled” to a high-fee fund. ...Read more
Superannuation
ISA takes another shot at super reforms, accuses government of favouring big banks
Just a few days after hitting out at the government’s Your Future, Your Super scheme, ISA is at it again, signalling to the government that it may have a fight on its hands when it comes to this now...Read more
Superannuation
Royal commission reforms pass Parliament signaling more super oversight
The first bill implementing recommendations from Hayne’s banking royal commission has passed through the Parliament. ...Read more
Superannuation
Fears half of super system may be exempt from performance test
While the Your Future, Your Super measure has been a topic of debate for weeks over its ability to create possibly unintended consequences, new questions have emerged about the measure’s ability to ...Read more
More articles
Website Notifications
Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.
