Retirement
Battle brews over new changes to insurance in superannuation
The federal government has copped heat for its plans to again change the nature of insurance in superannuation, as consumers continue to grapple with a complex and costly market.
Battle brews over new changes to insurance in superannuation
The federal government has copped heat for its plans to again change the nature of insurance in superannuation, as consumers continue to grapple with a complex and costly market.
Dr Michael Easson, independent chair of ASFA, took the opportunity of his chair’s welcome to contest the Liberal government’s plans to make changes to life insurance cover for certain superannuation accounts.
He said ASFA was “opposed to wiping out insurance cover for vulnerable young workers. We are opposed to substantive changes that add to cost and complexity”.
His comments preceded those of Assistant Treasurer Stuart Robert, who said in his speech that “the government believes Australians should not be defaulted into insurance they did not ask for, cannot claim on, or which is significantly beyond what they need”.
What changes are in the works?
The debate has been spurred by the Liberal government’s plans that will see life insurance on superannuation accounts with balances less than $6,000 mandated to be on an opt-in basis.
The proposal is part of the government’s ‘Protecting Your Super’ package, which aims to improve superannuation governance, and is designed to stop low superannuation balances from being diminished by fees.
In its original form, the changes applied to all low balance accounts, accounts of new members under the age of 25 and those that have not received a contribution or rollover for 13 months or more.
However, pressure from the relevant stakeholders has seen the Liberal government announce that the opt-in measure will not be applied to workers in ‘dangerous occupations’ that may potentially benefit from default insurance in superannuation.
“The government has decided to make available an exception to the opt‑in changes for new members in prescribed dangerous occupations, such as police officers, truck drivers, farmers or concreters, who are under 25 years old or have an active low balance account, where trustees elect to apply it,” Mr Robert clarified in his address.
“In determining which occupations will be considered dangerous for the purpose of the exception, we will consider risks across all occupations, and will consult publicly, in the time available, on the exempt occupations.”
Where the opposition stands
While debate at the ASFA Conference transpired yesterday, the Labor opposition announced it will move to extend this amendment to encompass those in physically demanding jobs, such as hospital workers and warehouse operators, and those with young families.
Despite his strong affirmations, Mr Easson’s comments are seemingly not universally upheld in the super industry.
Against the backdrop of yesterday’s developments, Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees chief executive Eva Scheerlinck released a statement declaring she broadly welcomed the government’s proposed changes.
However, Ms Scheerlinck emphasised her support for Labor’s recommendations, saying it was a “much-needed measure to ensure workers who needed insurance did not have it cut off”, and professed that the government’s proposed amendment “did not go fair enough”.
She also urged the government to reconsider the implementation deadline, which would see all super funds required to renegotiate their default insurance contracts within a seven-month time frame.
“The implementation period for insurance is way too short,” Ms Scheerlinck said.
“It won’t give funds time to get a better deal for their members in the marketplace – it’s going to push up premiums.”
Superannuation
New super laws divide industry groups
Your Future, Your Super legislations have reached Parliament, dividing opinions among key stakeholders. ...Read more
Superannuation
ISA applauds Minister Hume for opposing super for a home plan
The government has no immediate plans to allow Australians to access their superannuation to buy a home, Jane Hume has confirmed, despite ongoing calls from backbenchers. ...Read more
Superannuation
Your Future, Your Super hits Parliament
The controversial Your Future, Your Super reform package has been introduced to Parliament, paving the way for the continuation of the government’s fierce debate with the super sector. ...Read more
Superannuation
Super funds deliver slim January gains
Superannuation funds have made ‘a small but positive result’ at the start of 2021, although the pandemic still poses a significant risk to future returns, new research has revealed. ...Read more
Superannuation
Age pension to explode if super guarantee is ditched: ISA
Failing to lift the superannuation guarantee to 12 per cent will inflate Australia’s aged pension bill to $33 billion by 2058, and may lead to tax hikes to meet the bulging burden, new research has ...Read more
Superannuation
Why it’s the right idea but wrong time to lift the SG
As Australia surfaces from its first economic recession in almost three decades, the focus should be on creating new jobs instead of lifting the superannuation guarantee, an accounting body has said....Read more
Superannuation
‘RBA helping the government knock off’ super increase: Keating
Former Prime Minister Paul Keating has accused the Reserve Bank of Australia of laziness, opining that the bank is aiding the government in knocking off the legislated superannuation increase at the...Read more
Superannuation
Are bigger funds better for members?
As the march of the megafunds begins, Australia’s superannuation sector will need to seriously consider whether a merger is in their best interests. ...Read more
Superannuation
New super laws divide industry groups
Your Future, Your Super legislations have reached Parliament, dividing opinions among key stakeholders. ...Read more
Superannuation
ISA applauds Minister Hume for opposing super for a home plan
The government has no immediate plans to allow Australians to access their superannuation to buy a home, Jane Hume has confirmed, despite ongoing calls from backbenchers. ...Read more
Superannuation
Your Future, Your Super hits Parliament
The controversial Your Future, Your Super reform package has been introduced to Parliament, paving the way for the continuation of the government’s fierce debate with the super sector. ...Read more
Superannuation
Super funds deliver slim January gains
Superannuation funds have made ‘a small but positive result’ at the start of 2021, although the pandemic still poses a significant risk to future returns, new research has revealed. ...Read more
Superannuation
Age pension to explode if super guarantee is ditched: ISA
Failing to lift the superannuation guarantee to 12 per cent will inflate Australia’s aged pension bill to $33 billion by 2058, and may lead to tax hikes to meet the bulging burden, new research has ...Read more
Superannuation
Why it’s the right idea but wrong time to lift the SG
As Australia surfaces from its first economic recession in almost three decades, the focus should be on creating new jobs instead of lifting the superannuation guarantee, an accounting body has said....Read more
Superannuation
‘RBA helping the government knock off’ super increase: Keating
Former Prime Minister Paul Keating has accused the Reserve Bank of Australia of laziness, opining that the bank is aiding the government in knocking off the legislated superannuation increase at the...Read more
Superannuation
Are bigger funds better for members?
As the march of the megafunds begins, Australia’s superannuation sector will need to seriously consider whether a merger is in their best interests. ...Read more
More articles
Website Notifications
Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.
