subscribe to our newsletter sign up

Criticism of super and property ‘ill-founded’

The debate that is “swirling” around SMSFs and residential property investment is not based on true figures, according to the SMSF Professionals’ Association of Australia (SPAA).

 

Evidence to date suggests SMSF trustees are cautious investors when it comes to property, SPAA’s head of education, Liz Ward, told nestegg.com.au’s sister publication, The Adviser.

“Firstly, much of the criticism of SMSF trustee investment in residential property is ill-founded,” Ms Ward said.

“Second, SPAA believes that once the true numbers are published, it will fundamentally show that the funds’ investment in property continues to be small in comparison to other investment classes.”

SMSF trustees have also been cautious when it comes to limited recourse borrowing arrangements, Ms Ward said. At 30 June 2013, ATO statistics show geared assets in SMSFs make up less than one half of one per cent of their total investments.

“New figures might change this investment outlook, but we remain confident that trustees will continue to invest prudently, especially where they enlist the support of an SMSF specialist,” Ms Ward said.

“Property is not an inappropriate investment per se... but it must be appropriate to the SMSF and consider the member’s circumstances, just like all investments, whether they are via an SMSF or personal investment decisions outside superannuation,” she concluded.

Criticism of super and property ‘ill-founded’
nestegg logo
Promoted Content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
Anonymous - Can anyone please explain - if I were a Board/CEO of a public company (apparently quite a high risk occupation from now on), why not just declare.......
Anonymous - Hear hear!....
Anonymous - Easy to 'slam' figures and yet proffer none yourself, Bowen.

Rather than being boorish, before proposing such radical reforms, surely an in depth.......
Anonymous - While not defending the adviser in this case, as he should have run a mile as soon as he heard the goals, this woman would have been working until 80.......