Invest
What is the 1 per cent rule in real estate?
What is the 1 percent rule in real estate? We break down how this guideline is applied when investing in property and how it can work to your advantage.
What is the 1 per cent rule in real estate?
What is the 1 percent rule in real estate? We break down how this guideline is applied when investing in property and how it can work to your advantage.
The 1 per cent rule, sometimes stylised as the “1% rule”, is a rule of thumb that property investors use to quickly evaluate whether a prospective real estate investment should be examined more closely.
While it is a popular guideline among investors when buying a property for income-generating purposes, there are instances where this rule might not be as helpful as most people claim it is.
Let’s look at how this rule is applied in real estate investing and when it is best to follow this guideline.
What is the 1 per cent rule?
The 1 per cent rule is used by real estate investors when assessing a potential property purchase. According to this rule, the monthly rental income generated from a property must be equal or greater than 1 per cent of the purchase price. The main goal of this rule is to ensure that an investor will break-even or make profit from the property.

This rule serves as a baseline for establishing the rental rate that investment property owners charge on their real estate space. This rule can be applied to both residential and commercial real estate properties.
The 1 per cent rule also instils an income discipline mindset in investors when buying investment properties. Discipline yourself to buy only real estate investments that will have a positive cash flow, which can help you make more money and in the process prevent you from making common property investment mistakes.
But keep in mind that the 1 per cent rule is not meant to give you a precise result, but only an educated guess. The rule’s formula does not take into account the other property expenses, like the ongoing costs (e.g. repairs and maintenance), loan and acquisition fees, exit costs, insurance, taxes etc. With this, investors are advised to take the resulting figures with a grain of salt and to use the rule as a way to set expectations about an investment property.
How do you calculate whether a property passes the 1 percent rule?
Under the 1 percent rule, a rental investment property should meet the follow criteria:
Monthly rental income ≥ One percent of purchase price
To calculate whether a property passes the 1 per cent rule, the formula used is:
Rent / purchase price x 100
Here is an example of an application of the 1 per cent rule. You are eyeing an investment that is valued at $100,000. You are planning to charge tenants $1,000 per month. Your calculations should look like this:
$1,000 / $100,000 x 100 = 1.0 per cent
So, according to the rule, the property can provide you with a positive cash flow and can be a good investment. But if you set the rate lower, at around $800, it would not meet the rule. If the purchase price is higher and the monthly rental rate is still at $1,000, it would also not meet the rule’s criteria.
But as we’ve discussed, the 1 per cent rule should not be used to put a “yes or no” stamp on a property. There are several factors to consider when finalising your purchase, and passing the 1 per cent rule is just the beginning. Let’s take a closer look when to use the rule and when not to.
When should you use the 1 per cent rule?
Generally, the 1 per cent rule is best used only as a pre-screening tool. It is a good way to save time and to be disciplined as an investor.
Let’s say your real estate agent sent you 50 properties that fit the basic criterias you have set for a potential property you are planning to buy. You choose to narrow down the choices by using the 1 per cent rule.
If narrowing which real estate properties pass the 1 per cent rule seems like a tedious process, here are ways to make it easier. First, calculate the 1 per cent of each property’s listed price by moving the decimal place two times to the left. For example, a property valued at $250,000 will result in $2,500.
After finding the 1 per cent figure for the purchase price, you can compare the results with the average market rent for the same type of property. If the monthly rent is near the 1 per cent of the acquisition or listing price, it may be worth it to further evaluate the property. However, if the rent is significantly lower than 1 per cent, you can choose to just remove that option.
When should you not use the 1 per cent rule?
Before narrowing your list of properties, you can work beyond the 1 per cent rule and use more in-depth tools to analyse a property. It is more of a guideline rather than a rule and should not be followed blindly.
Let’s say an investment property is worth $500,000 and rents for $500 monthly. While it satisfies the one per cent rule, it does not necessarily guarantee that it will be a good investment opportunity. You should also take into consideration property quality, location and the potential tenants into consideration.
Another problem with the 1 per cent rule is the use of the gross income of a property (or what you collect from your tenant). But at the heart of it, rental investing’s returns are measured by the net income (or the total amount after all expenses have been subtracted). To have a better approximation of a property’s cash flow, you must take into account the other expenses that come with investment properties (property management fees, vacancy period, taxes, insurance, maintenance, capital expenses and mortgage payments).
Purchasing a piece of property for investment requires a thorough analysis of numerous factors. Properties that are below the 1 per cent threshold can still be a great investment option. So, if you are eyeing a real estate that did not pass the 1 per cent rule with flying colors, don’t easily write it off without taking into account other fundamental factors that influence overall rate of return.
Property market experts also do not recommend using the property for high-priced real estate. Let’s say you are planning to buy a property in Sydney where the average sale price is currently $1,142,212. The average monthly rental rate in the area is estimated to be at $2,121. To pass the 1 per cent rule, you need $11,422.12 monthly rental income. This means that if you want to meet this requirement in practice, you have to buy an investment property at a much lower value than the average price to pass the rule.
The 1 per cent rule can be more applicable to certain types of properties, usually small residential rentals. If you are buying a big building with multiple units or a commercial property, you may set a bigger expected rental income than what the 1 per cent can provide.
Conclusion
While the 1 per cent rule can be used as a screening tool for potential investment properties, it should only be used as a guide and not a make-or-break benchmark by investors. It is just one measurement tool that can help an investor gauge the risk and potential returns that might be achieved by investing in a property. Your decision to purchase must also be based on personal and financial goals as well as your set criteria as a real estate investor.
Property
New investment platform Arkus allows Australians to invest in property for just $1
In a groundbreaking move to democratise investment in property-backed mortgage funds, GPS Investment Fund Limited has launched Arkus™, a retail investment platform designed to make investing ...Read more
Property
Help to Buy goes live: What 40,000 new buyers mean for banks, builders and the bottom line
Australia’s Help to Buy has opened, lowering the deposit hurdle to 2 per cent and aiming to support up to 40,000 households over four years. That single policy lever will reverberate through mortgage ...Read more
Property
Australia’s mortgage knife‑fight: investors, first‑home buyers and the new rules of lender competition
The mortgage market is staying hot even as rate relief remains elusive, with investors and first‑home buyers chasing scarce stock and lenders fighting for share on price, speed and digital experienceRead more
Property
Breaking Australia’s three‑property ceiling: the finance‑first playbook for scalable portfolios
Most Australian investors don’t stall at three properties because they run out of ambition — they run out of borrowing capacity. The ceiling is a finance constraint disguised as an asset problem. The ...Read more
Property
Gen Z's secret weapon: Why their homebuying spree could flip Australia's housing market
A surprising share of younger Australians are preparing to buy despite affordability headwinds. One in three Gen Z Australians intend to purchase within a few years and 32 per cent say escaping rent ...Read more
Property
Tasmania’s pet-positive pivot: What landlords, BTR operators and insurers need to do now
Tasmania will soon require landlords to allow pets unless they can prove a valid reason to refuse. This is more than a tenancy tweak; it is a structural signal that the balance of power in rental ...Read more
Property
NSW underquoting crackdown: the compliance reset creating both cost and competitive edge
NSW is moving to sharply increase penalties for misleading price guides, including fines linked to agent commissions and maximum penalties up to $110,000. Behind the headlines sits a more ...Read more
Property
ANZ’s mortgage growth, profit slump: why volume without margin won’t pay the dividends
ANZ lifted home-lending volumes, yet profits fell under the weight of regulatory and restructuring costs—an object lesson in the futility of growth that doesn’t convert to margin and productivityRead more
Property
New investment platform Arkus allows Australians to invest in property for just $1
In a groundbreaking move to democratise investment in property-backed mortgage funds, GPS Investment Fund Limited has launched Arkus™, a retail investment platform designed to make investing ...Read more
Property
Help to Buy goes live: What 40,000 new buyers mean for banks, builders and the bottom line
Australia’s Help to Buy has opened, lowering the deposit hurdle to 2 per cent and aiming to support up to 40,000 households over four years. That single policy lever will reverberate through mortgage ...Read more
Property
Australia’s mortgage knife‑fight: investors, first‑home buyers and the new rules of lender competition
The mortgage market is staying hot even as rate relief remains elusive, with investors and first‑home buyers chasing scarce stock and lenders fighting for share on price, speed and digital experienceRead more
Property
Breaking Australia’s three‑property ceiling: the finance‑first playbook for scalable portfolios
Most Australian investors don’t stall at three properties because they run out of ambition — they run out of borrowing capacity. The ceiling is a finance constraint disguised as an asset problem. The ...Read more
Property
Gen Z's secret weapon: Why their homebuying spree could flip Australia's housing market
A surprising share of younger Australians are preparing to buy despite affordability headwinds. One in three Gen Z Australians intend to purchase within a few years and 32 per cent say escaping rent ...Read more
Property
Tasmania’s pet-positive pivot: What landlords, BTR operators and insurers need to do now
Tasmania will soon require landlords to allow pets unless they can prove a valid reason to refuse. This is more than a tenancy tweak; it is a structural signal that the balance of power in rental ...Read more
Property
NSW underquoting crackdown: the compliance reset creating both cost and competitive edge
NSW is moving to sharply increase penalties for misleading price guides, including fines linked to agent commissions and maximum penalties up to $110,000. Behind the headlines sits a more ...Read more
Property
ANZ’s mortgage growth, profit slump: why volume without margin won’t pay the dividends
ANZ lifted home-lending volumes, yet profits fell under the weight of regulatory and restructuring costs—an object lesson in the futility of growth that doesn’t convert to margin and productivityRead more
