Invest
To cut through the BS, ‘look out for impact’
The question around institutional investors’ ability to truly pivot towards responsible investing remains, but retail investors can make change by looking for impact, a fund manager has said.
To cut through the BS, ‘look out for impact’
The question around institutional investors’ ability to truly pivot towards responsible investing remains, but retail investors can make change by looking for impact, a fund manager has said.
When it comes to responsible investing, institutional investors and larger funds can face inertia thanks to the sheer volume of demands and expectations. However, retail investors can avoid being sucked into “greenwashed” products that cater to the lowest ESG-aligned (environmental, social and governance) denominator by focusing on the impact of their investments, WHEB Asset Management’s Ted Franks recently told Nest Egg.
“There is this increasing use of this idea of impact, which is one step beyond ESG,” he said.
He said that while it’s tricky for larger investment products and firms to deliver responsible investment solutions, the ability for these groups to “get away with BS” is limited when faced with investors genuinely interested in impact, rather than ESG investments.
However, the semantics of the issue are where investors may stumble, Morgan Stanley’s head of wealth management research Nathan Lim recognised in a recent BetaShares briefing.
Mr Lim said the point he most wanted to get across to investors was the distinction between restrictive, ESG and impact investing.
He explained: “A lot of investors or market commentators use words like ethical or ESG or impact like they all mean the same thing… but I think it's very important from an education perspective that we all must be very careful with the words that we use to describe what we're doing.”
While restrictive screening, as the name suggests, screens out industries like tobacco, sugar or coal, ESG-aligned products monitor the environmental, supply-chain and ethics of their composite parts.
The next tier up on the responsible investing ladder is impact investing.
This means that the investments look beyond avoiding harm to actively seeking solutions to specific challenges like climate change, fossil fuel reliance or water scarcity.
Mr Franks gave the example of ESG-compliant Unilever which protects its supply chain, promotes transparency and monitors its environmental impact.
All of these are good things, but essentially Unilever makes ice-cream, so it’s a net neutral investment.
He argued that by beginning the search for ethical investments with the end impact, investors are much more likely to build a strategy more aligned with their responsible goals.
In conversation with the Responsible Investment Association of Australia, BT Financial Group’s head of customer governance and sustainability Emma Pringle said investors are increasingly expecting – rather than seeking – a baseline of responsible investment across every asset class.
“However, what we’re seeing, through our conversations with our customers and adviser network, is that confusion still exists about what is (and what isn’t) a responsible investment; what investors can expect from a sustainable or ethical fund, in terms of performance and also characteristics; and how to access responsible investment products,” Ms Pringle added.
RELATED ARTICLES
Property
Multigenerational living is moving mainstream: how agents, developers and lenders can monetise the shift
Australia’s quiet housing revolution is no longer a niche lifestyle choice; it’s a structural shift in demand that will reward property businesses prepared to redesign product, pricing and ...Read more
Property
The new battleground in housing: how first-home buyer policy is reshaping Australia’s entry-level market
Government-backed guarantees and stamp duty concessions have pushed fresh demand into the bottom of Australia’s price ladder, lifting values and compressing selling times in entry-level segmentsRead more
Property
Property 2026: Why measured moves will beat the market
In 2026, Australian property success will be won by investors who privilege resilience over velocity. The market is fragmenting by suburb and asset type, financing conditions remain tight, and ...Read more
Property
Entry-level property is winning: How first home buyer programs are reshaping demand, pricing power and strategy
Lower-priced homes are appreciating faster as government support channels demand into the entry tier. For developers, lenders and marketers, this is not a blip—it’s a structural reweighting of demand ...Read more
Property
Scarcity premiums, squeezed yields: Australia’s housing bottleneck is rewriting investor strategy
Australia’s housing pipeline has thinned to a decade low, locking in a scarcity premium that narrows investor flexibility, compresses yields and extends hold periods. With only 172,000 dwellings ...Read more
Property
Australia’s housing bottleneck isn’t a demand problem — it’s a construction maths problem
The economics of building have broken for mainstream housing in Australia. Input costs, labour scarcity and approvals drag are collapsing project feasibility, tilting capital to luxury builds and ...Read more
Property
2026 property expansion? Why disciplined investors will wait — and where to play offence
A growing chorus of market practitioners is urging investors to pause portfolio expansion in 2026 as returns compress and policy settings tighten. The headline risk is less about price crashes and ...Read more
Property
Cost, red tape and capital: why Australia’s housing pipeline is shrinking — and how to rebuild it
Australia’s housing pipeline is being choked by a toxic mix of escalating input costs, regulatory drag and tighter finance. The result: mid-market projects stall while luxury builds proceed, pushing ...Read more
Property
Multigenerational living is moving mainstream: how agents, developers and lenders can monetise the shift
Australia’s quiet housing revolution is no longer a niche lifestyle choice; it’s a structural shift in demand that will reward property businesses prepared to redesign product, pricing and ...Read more
Property
The new battleground in housing: how first-home buyer policy is reshaping Australia’s entry-level market
Government-backed guarantees and stamp duty concessions have pushed fresh demand into the bottom of Australia’s price ladder, lifting values and compressing selling times in entry-level segmentsRead more
Property
Property 2026: Why measured moves will beat the market
In 2026, Australian property success will be won by investors who privilege resilience over velocity. The market is fragmenting by suburb and asset type, financing conditions remain tight, and ...Read more
Property
Entry-level property is winning: How first home buyer programs are reshaping demand, pricing power and strategy
Lower-priced homes are appreciating faster as government support channels demand into the entry tier. For developers, lenders and marketers, this is not a blip—it’s a structural reweighting of demand ...Read more
Property
Scarcity premiums, squeezed yields: Australia’s housing bottleneck is rewriting investor strategy
Australia’s housing pipeline has thinned to a decade low, locking in a scarcity premium that narrows investor flexibility, compresses yields and extends hold periods. With only 172,000 dwellings ...Read more
Property
Australia’s housing bottleneck isn’t a demand problem — it’s a construction maths problem
The economics of building have broken for mainstream housing in Australia. Input costs, labour scarcity and approvals drag are collapsing project feasibility, tilting capital to luxury builds and ...Read more
Property
2026 property expansion? Why disciplined investors will wait — and where to play offence
A growing chorus of market practitioners is urging investors to pause portfolio expansion in 2026 as returns compress and policy settings tighten. The headline risk is less about price crashes and ...Read more
Property
Cost, red tape and capital: why Australia’s housing pipeline is shrinking — and how to rebuild it
Australia’s housing pipeline is being choked by a toxic mix of escalating input costs, regulatory drag and tighter finance. The result: mid-market projects stall while luxury builds proceed, pushing ...Read more
