Invest
Cautionary tale for investors in dodgy agent’s ban
A real estate agent has copped a lengthy ban following his dodgy dealings with property investors, serving as a timely reminder for sellers and buyers alike to exercise caution with the professionals they deal with.
Cautionary tale for investors in dodgy agent’s ban
A real estate agent has copped a lengthy ban following his dodgy dealings with property investors, serving as a timely reminder for sellers and buyers alike to exercise caution with the professionals they deal with.
A real estate agent, Joseph Weng Kong Cheong, who forged signatures and prepared bogus listing and sales contracts has had his licence cancelled and has been banned from working in the industry in WA for 15 years.
The State Administrative Tribunal (SAT) reprimanded Mr Cheong and his company Easy Invest Pty Ltd, formerly based in Rivervale, and cancelled their licences as a result of disciplinary action taken by Consumer Protection, the Department of Commerce said in a statement.
Mr Cheong was found to have acted unfairly and dishonestly in breach of the Real Estate and Business Agents Act and the Code of Conduct for Agents and Sales Representatives in regard to the proposed sale of two properties in East Victoria Park and East Perth.
Mr Cheong and his company entered into legitimate ‘selling agency agreements’ with two property owners in August 2015, both providing for a commission of 2.2 per cent. Unknown to the owners, fake alternate agreements were drawn up which provided for a 3.2 per cent commission and the owners’ signatures were forged by Mr Cheong on the alternate contracts.
In October 2015, Mr Cheong drew up ‘offer and acceptance’ contracts using the names of bogus buyers which were never presented to the owners. The buyers’ names were randomly selected from the phone book. Mr Cheong forged the signatures of the bogus buyers and falsified the owners’ signatures to make it appear that they had accepted the offers.
The forged documents were then submitted to a finance company as part of an application for an advance on the 3.2 per cent commission. The company paid Mr Cheong a total of $30,339.82. Mr Cheong was not entitled to any commission as neither party to the contracts had actually signed them.
The SAT noted that Mr Cheong had repaid the finance company and the owners of the properties did not suffer any financial detriment as a result of his dishonest behaviour.
Acting commissioner for Consumer Protection David Hillyard said this was a case of serious dishonesty that warranted serious consequences.
“To carry out such an elaborate deception in two separate real estate transactions falls within the extremely serious scale of dishonest conduct and the SAT has shown that such behaviour will attract a serious penalty,” Mr Hillyard said.
“The lengthy ban is more than justified and should serve as a reminder to all real estate agents and sales representatives to act in an honest and transparent manner at all times in transactions involving the sale of property.
“I expect agents will uphold their fiduciary duty and always place the interests of their sellers above their own. Agents who fail to uphold this basic duty will be held accountable.”
RELATED ARTICLES
Property
Australia’s mortgage knife‑fight: investors, first‑home buyers and the new rules of lender competition
The mortgage market is staying hot even as rate relief remains elusive, with investors and first‑home buyers chasing scarce stock and lenders fighting for share on price, speed and digital experienceRead more
Property
Breaking Australia’s three‑property ceiling: the finance‑first playbook for scalable portfolios
Most Australian investors don’t stall at three properties because they run out of ambition — they run out of borrowing capacity. The ceiling is a finance constraint disguised as an asset problem. The ...Read more
Property
Gen Z's secret weapon: Why their homebuying spree could flip Australia's housing market
A surprising share of younger Australians are preparing to buy despite affordability headwinds. One in three Gen Z Australians intend to purchase within a few years and 32 per cent say escaping rent ...Read more
Property
Tasmania’s pet-positive pivot: What landlords, BTR operators and insurers need to do now
Tasmania will soon require landlords to allow pets unless they can prove a valid reason to refuse. This is more than a tenancy tweak; it is a structural signal that the balance of power in rental ...Read more
Property
NSW underquoting crackdown: the compliance reset creating both cost and competitive edge
NSW is moving to sharply increase penalties for misleading price guides, including fines linked to agent commissions and maximum penalties up to $110,000. Behind the headlines sits a more ...Read more
Property
ANZ’s mortgage growth, profit slump: why volume without margin won’t pay the dividends
ANZ lifted home-lending volumes, yet profits fell under the weight of regulatory and restructuring costs—an object lesson in the futility of growth that doesn’t convert to margin and productivityRead more
Property
Rate pause, busy summer: where smart capital wins in Australia’s property market
With the Reserve Bank holding rates steady, the summer selling season arrives with rare predictability. Liquidity will lift, serviceability stops getting worse, and sentiment stabilises. The ...Read more
Property
The 2026 Suburb Thesis: A case study in turning trend lists into investable strategy
A new crop of ‘suburbs to watch’ is hitting headlines, but translating shortlist hype into bottom-line results requires more than a map and a mood. This case study shows how a disciplined, data-led ...Read more
Property
Australia’s mortgage knife‑fight: investors, first‑home buyers and the new rules of lender competition
The mortgage market is staying hot even as rate relief remains elusive, with investors and first‑home buyers chasing scarce stock and lenders fighting for share on price, speed and digital experienceRead more
Property
Breaking Australia’s three‑property ceiling: the finance‑first playbook for scalable portfolios
Most Australian investors don’t stall at three properties because they run out of ambition — they run out of borrowing capacity. The ceiling is a finance constraint disguised as an asset problem. The ...Read more
Property
Gen Z's secret weapon: Why their homebuying spree could flip Australia's housing market
A surprising share of younger Australians are preparing to buy despite affordability headwinds. One in three Gen Z Australians intend to purchase within a few years and 32 per cent say escaping rent ...Read more
Property
Tasmania’s pet-positive pivot: What landlords, BTR operators and insurers need to do now
Tasmania will soon require landlords to allow pets unless they can prove a valid reason to refuse. This is more than a tenancy tweak; it is a structural signal that the balance of power in rental ...Read more
Property
NSW underquoting crackdown: the compliance reset creating both cost and competitive edge
NSW is moving to sharply increase penalties for misleading price guides, including fines linked to agent commissions and maximum penalties up to $110,000. Behind the headlines sits a more ...Read more
Property
ANZ’s mortgage growth, profit slump: why volume without margin won’t pay the dividends
ANZ lifted home-lending volumes, yet profits fell under the weight of regulatory and restructuring costs—an object lesson in the futility of growth that doesn’t convert to margin and productivityRead more
Property
Rate pause, busy summer: where smart capital wins in Australia’s property market
With the Reserve Bank holding rates steady, the summer selling season arrives with rare predictability. Liquidity will lift, serviceability stops getting worse, and sentiment stabilises. The ...Read more
Property
The 2026 Suburb Thesis: A case study in turning trend lists into investable strategy
A new crop of ‘suburbs to watch’ is hitting headlines, but translating shortlist hype into bottom-line results requires more than a map and a mood. This case study shows how a disciplined, data-led ...Read more
