Powered by momentummedia
nestegg logo
Powered by momentummedia
Powered by momentummedia
nestegg logo
nestegg logo

 

 

Retirement

CBA fails Aussies with super switching miscarriage, misleading language

  • August 15 2018
  • Share

Retirement

CBA fails Aussies with super switching miscarriage, misleading language

By Lucy Dean
August 15 2018

Thousands of Colonial First State customers were left in higher-cost funds, rather than shifted into lower-cost accounts as mandated by law, the royal commission has heard.

CBA, Commonwealth Bank of Australia

CBA fails Aussies with super switching miscarriage, misleading language

author image
  • August 15 2018
  • Share

Thousands of Colonial First State customers were left in higher-cost funds, rather than shifted into lower-cost accounts as mandated by law, the royal commission has heard.

CBA, Commonwealth Bank of Australia

The 15,000 customers who had not chosen a fund were to be moved into basic MySuper accounts by 1 January 2014, however, as the commission heard, this did not eventuate.

The executive general manager of Commonwealth Bank-owned Colonial First State, Linda Elkins, said the decision came down to “operational risk”. Senior counsel Michael Hodge described it as an “offence”, while Ms Elkins preferred the term “error”.

However, the commission also heard that upon failed super-switch, Colonial First State began a campaign encouraging customers to remain in its fund to retain revenue.

Customers were told, “if this transfer proceeds, your ongoing fees and costs may increase”, and prompted to make an investment decision to remain in the fund.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Another flyer told customers they would pay transfer costs and the new insurance cover may not be suitable.

“Can I suggest this letter is obviously drafted in a way to make the member concerned and apprehensive about their [account] being transitioned over to MySuper?” Mr Hodge asked.

“I agree that this letter is not balanced.”

It was the preferred refrain for Ms Elkins, who also agreed a call-out script that told savers they needed to confirm the investment decisions they made or would like to make, was “not correct”. There was no such requirement.

She went on to say the script “should have been more balanced in the way it described [a requirement for an investment decision].”

However, Mr Hodge shot back, “When you say ‘more balanced’, do you mean not misleading?”

It was the first day of pain for Colonial First State, with Ms Elkins taking more questions this morning on its insurance premiums and the charging of fees to dead customers.

Follow along here.

CBA fails Aussies with super switching miscarriage, misleading language
CBA, Commonwealth Bank of Australia
nestegg logo

Forward this article to a friend. Follow us on Linkedin. Join us on Facebook. Find us on Twitter for the latest updates
Rate the article

more on this topic

more on this topic

From the web

Recommended by Spike Native Network

More articles

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.