subscribe to our newsletter sign up

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.

Not budging on negative gearing: Labor ministers stand firm

Chris Bowen

The federal budget papers warn of economic headwinds fuelled by the housing downturn, but senior Labor ministers say the party stands firm on its negative gearing policy. 

If elected, the Labor Party will limit negative gearing to new housing from 1 January 2020.

Further, the Labor Party plans to halve the capital gains discount for all assets purchased after 1 January 2020. In effect, this will reduce the capital gains tax discount for assets that are held longer than 12 months from 50 per cent to 25 per cent.

On both measures, all changes will be grandfathered, which means they won’t apply retrospectively.


Shadow assistant treasurer Andrew Leigh was asked if a Labor government would consider adjusting its negative gearing policy, given the property market conditions are starkly different today than they were when the policy was first announced three years ago.

The Sydney and Melbourne markets in particular have been in free fall, experiencing the biggest drops since the GFC.

Mr Leigh echoed shadow treasurer Chris Bowen in standing firm on Labor’s policy.

He said Labor’s policy is a “big picture” one and that the effectiveness of the policy is not reliant on a property market being buoyant. 

Not budging on negative gearing: Labor ministers stand firm
Chris Bowen
nestegg logo
subscribe to our newsletter sign up
Recommended by Spike Native Network
Anonymous - This is all identity politics rubbish. Inasmuch as most families are dual income earners and as most women are not in high paying jobs for a variety.......
Margaret - Happy that I won't be around in 2060....
Anonymous - This "analysis" is misconceived and should get a fail in statistics. Men pay more tax because they work more. So they should get more relief. And,.......
Anonymous - I'm not sure how the ATO can declare there is an "$8.7 Billion hole" without already being able to confirm that all these claims are illegitimate?