subscribe to our newsletter sign up

Big tax bills could face investors with property in super

Tax bills, taxes

One of Australia’s top SMSF experts believes investors could be in for a rough ride if they have property in their super, as the government continues to tighten regulations and legislation.

In recent months and years, the ATO has been particularly focused on stamping out related-party borrowing in superannuation, which in effect refers to borrowing from a source that is not commercial, like a bank or credit union.

The Tax Office has been concerned about borrowing on non-commercial terms for various reasons, including that SMSFs could be securing rates and structures that would otherwise not be accessible for other funds.

This financial year, the ATO has new data matching capability on its hands, and national leader of superannuation at accounting firm BDO, Shirley Schaefer, believes it’ll be all eyes on borrowing arrangements.

“Now that all those tax returns have been lodged, you might find the ATO does a bit of data matching and undertake a few reviews in this area,” said Ms Schaefer.

If it’s found that funds are not operating on commercial terms, they could be hit with the non-arm’s length income provisions, or NALI, which could mean a tax bill of up to 15 per cent. NALI is taxed at the top personal marginal rate.

This is the latest in a string of clampdowns from the government and regulators on borrowing in superannuation.

At the moment, a bill is before the Senate to have the outstanding loan amount on a borrowing within super added to a member’s total super balance. In many cases this has made borrowing in superannuation less attractive, as it means a leveraged asset could push a superannuation fund over the prescribed caps.

Big tax bills could face investors with property in super
Tax bills, taxes
nestegg logo
subscribe to our newsletter sign up
Recommended by Spike Native Network
Anonymous - "as the $8,500 a year subsidy will not offset the minimal rental yield gained off rents set at 20 per cent below the market"

This amount is.......
Brett - smallest spike ever....
Grant La Greca - Possibly you shouldn't be an SMSF trustee if you don't understand this....
Anonymous - Just admit it. You got it wrong the first time.....