subscribe to our newsletter sign up
Aussie super funds overcharging and underperforming

Aussie super funds overcharging and underperforming

Many Australians are paying too much in fees for underperforming super funds, according to the latest Stockspot report.

The study categorised 3,820 funds based on the fees charged compared to their overall performance, with 638 of the worst funds receiving the label of ‘fat cats’.

“We believe Australians deserve greater visibility around where their money is invested and how it is performing. The conflicts of interest that exist due to the vertical integration of product and advice providers has led to a situation where poor-performing products often slip under the radar of consumers,” Stockspot founder Chris Brycki said.

Of the funds reviewed, ANZ was found to be the worst super fund provider, charging more than $142 million in estimated fees and having 239 of the worst studied funds.

It was followed by AMP with 81, Westpac with 63, CBA with 50, while NAB had 32. The five banks represent 74 per cent of the worst superannuation funds in Australia, according to Stockspot.

On average, these ‘fat cats’ charged 2.04 per cent in fees, collecting more than $777 million each year.

The report also noted that industry funds regularly outperformed retail super, with 8 and 17 per cent of returns respectively being lost to fees.

Mr Brycki said the system needed to be reviewed.

“Given that superannuation is the single most important savings pot you will have in your life, surely this is an issue that needs urgent attention from [the] government?” he said.

The federal government recently supported the proposal to introduce a national default super fund in a bid to combat fees.

Aussie super funds overcharging and underperforming
nestegg logo
Promoted Content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
Skeptic - Even the headline is nonsense - how can migration have any effect on the ageing population - it is not like there is a possibility that we will be.......
Contrarian - w ch, you are far too generous in your opinion of this piece on migration’s effect on an ageing population. It is not just one-sided, in fact it.......
Nice to know nestegg... - Agreed - relying on multiples of long term average immigration 'to keep the average age down' is the definition of myopic. Young couples have new kids.......
w ch - Just another one sided article with no comment from experts opposed to immigration at its current vastly expanded rate. Its not matter what you elites.......