subscribe to our newsletter sign up

Property in SMSFs not a looming 'disaster': SMSFOA

The “noise” about the danger of property in SMSFs is coming from parties that are anti-SMSF, according to the SMSF Owners’ Alliance (SMSFOA).

 

Speaking at the Morningstar SMSF Trustee Strategy Day in Sydney last week, SMSFOA chairman Bruce Foy said people are led to believe there are “lots of traps” associated with property in SMSFs.

“I think there is a fair bit of noise out there about this issue and it is purely coming from those parties that are anti-SMSF, in my view,” he said.

“I don’t think there is a disaster waiting to happen, as some people would have you believe, and I think some of the larger APRA-regulated funds and even the industry funds have a vested interest in not losing money to SMSFs,” he added.

“I think property is a terrific asset class and if you can invest, you should.”

However, Oasis Wealth principal Barbara Smith said trustees should be aware of the “complexities” of transferring property from their own name to their SMSF.

“If you bought something in your own hands, you are going to incur capital gains tax and have all the stamp duty hoops to go through, so I don’t think it is worth transferring property out of your own hands and into your super fund,” she said.

Property in SMSFs not a looming 'disaster': SMSFOA
nestegg logo
Promoted Content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
Jo public - This is the home of a guy who judges other peoples taste on national television???....
Philip - Perth - Anonymous, below is the one who doesn't know how this works. Company tax is NOT tax on shareholders - it's tax on the activity of the company AND.......
DJ - The ease of importing already skilled labour has also distorted the training & employment of locals as its now easier for business to import rather.......
Wildcat - The reason we are such a low taxing country is less than 50% of the population pays any net tax at all. More than 50% of the tax revenue is paid by.......