subscribe to our newsletter sign up

Populist lesson for Aussie economy

With Brexit and the election of Donald Trump both riding the growing wave of populism around the world, an economist has warned Australian politicians to take note.

Economist and senior fellow of think tank Per Capita Stephen Koukoulas says the populist victories of 2016 demonstrate the dangers inherent in globalisation without compensation.

“There is a net benefit of global trade [but] it’s pretty clear what happened with globalisation is that the economic theory didn’t turn out in practice because the benefits of trade were accruing very strongly to the top end of town,” Mr Koukoulas told nestegg.com.au.

“The theory is that you specialise, compensate the losers and the economy is net better off, but the problem was that while our economies were better off, [the benefits] didn’t get to the people who were hurting.”

In the aftermath of the Brexit result, a breakdown of the vote showed that the ‘Remain’ and ‘Leave’ votes were largely cast along socio-economic lines, with those left behind in working class areas more likely to vote to leave the EU.

Source: BBC, Brexit vote by area

Meanwhile in the US presidential elections, Trump’s victory was partly attributed to his appeal in ‘Rust Belt states’, with his anti-trade rhetoric striking a chord with those hardest hit by the loss of manufacturing jobs.

“It reveals a lot of inequality and redistribution issues, and it shows that the people who do lose from globalisation [need to be] compensated through spending, tax cuts and these sorts of things that will stop them being so pissed off that they’ll vote for someone like Trump,” Mr Koukoulas said.

“If some of that wealth creation from globalisation had, through government policy, health, education, and tax policy, been allocated towards lower income earners or those particularly suffering the fallout from their industries shutting down in the US, the UK and Australia even, then we wouldn’t have this groundswell of support for these fringe players.”

With 2016 demonstrating the heavy political cost of a disenfranchised working class, Australian politicians may have to re-evaluate their economic policies.

“I think Australian politicians have taken note of all this and are trying to work out what it means. Both parties want to win the next election and they’re working out they can avoid a Trump or Pauline Hanson undercutting them one way or another,” Mr Koukoulas said.

“Maybe we’re going to have more progressivity in the tax system as a means of dealing with this problem from the major mainstream political parties in Australia. Maybe that is the solution.”

Populist lesson for Aussie economy
nestegg logo
Promoted Content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
Philip - Perth - Anonymous, below is the one who doesn't know how this works. Company tax is NOT tax on shareholders - it's tax on the activity of the company AND.......
DJ - The ease of importing already skilled labour has also distorted the training & employment of locals as its now easier for business to import rather.......
Wildcat - The reason we are such a low taxing country is less than 50% of the population pays any net tax at all. More than 50% of the tax revenue is paid by.......
Dr Terry Dwyer, Dwye... - This is misleading since one has to add workers compensation, compulsory third party and super guarantee as quasi-taxes to compare with European.......